{"title":"ESTOPPEL","authors":"سارة زين","doi":"10.4324/9781843143086-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theory of Estoppel, originating in common law, also draws its sources from the continental law system since the Digest of Justinian and the Majala of the Ottoman Era. There was already the rule “ venire contra factum proprium nulli conceditur” and the prohibition against going against one’s own act. The entrenchment of estoppel in English and American Law covers the absence of a general principle of good faith in contractual matters. It has an exclusive defensive function, however in American and Australian laws it is possible to use the mechanism of estoppel in an offensive way, which is based on an idea that a party must not allow damage to increase if he could reasonably attenuated it.","PeriodicalId":408531,"journal":{"name":"BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - مجلة الدراسات القانونية","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BAU Journal - Journal of Legal Studies - مجلة الدراسات القانونية","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843143086-48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The theory of Estoppel, originating in common law, also draws its sources from the continental law system since the Digest of Justinian and the Majala of the Ottoman Era. There was already the rule “ venire contra factum proprium nulli conceditur” and the prohibition against going against one’s own act. The entrenchment of estoppel in English and American Law covers the absence of a general principle of good faith in contractual matters. It has an exclusive defensive function, however in American and Australian laws it is possible to use the mechanism of estoppel in an offensive way, which is based on an idea that a party must not allow damage to increase if he could reasonably attenuated it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
禁止反言
禁止反悔理论起源于英美法系,同时也从欧陆法系的《查士丁尼摘要》和奥斯曼帝国时代的《马贾拉》中汲取了其渊源。当时已经有了“事实不为正当”的规则和禁止违背自己行为的规定。英美法中禁止反悔原则的确立涵盖了合同事项中普遍诚信原则的缺失。它具有排他性的防御功能,但在美国和澳大利亚的法律中,禁止反悔机制可以用于进攻性的方式,这是基于一种理念,即一方当事人如果能够合理地减轻损害,就不得允许损害增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PENAL LIABILITY FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HUMANITARIAN AID: PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW CONFRONTING POLITICAL INTERESTS AND INFLUENCE THE DUTY OF RESERVATION IN PUBLIC OFFICE VIRTUAL HEARINGS IN ARBITRATION THE ROLE OF BANK GOVERNANCE IN ECONOMIC REFORMAN APPLIED STUDY ON THE NATIONAL BANK OF EGYPT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1