{"title":"Occupancy and Daily Activity Event Modelling in Smart Homes for Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia","authors":"F. D. Casagrande, E. Zouganeli","doi":"10.3384/ECP18153236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we present event anticipation and prediction of sensor data in a smart home environment with a limited number of sensors. Data is collected from a real home with one resident. We apply two state-of-the-art Markovbased prediction algorithms − Active LeZi and SPEED − and analyse their performance with respect to a number of parameters, including the size of the training and testing set, the size of the prediction window, and the number of sensors. The model is built based on a training dataset and subsequently tested on a separate test dataset. An accuracy of 75% is achieved when using SPEED while 53% is achieved when using Active LeZi.","PeriodicalId":350464,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The 59th Conference on imulation and Modelling (SIMS 59), 26-28 September 2018, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The 59th Conference on imulation and Modelling (SIMS 59), 26-28 September 2018, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/ECP18153236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
In this paper we present event anticipation and prediction of sensor data in a smart home environment with a limited number of sensors. Data is collected from a real home with one resident. We apply two state-of-the-art Markovbased prediction algorithms − Active LeZi and SPEED − and analyse their performance with respect to a number of parameters, including the size of the training and testing set, the size of the prediction window, and the number of sensors. The model is built based on a training dataset and subsequently tested on a separate test dataset. An accuracy of 75% is achieved when using SPEED while 53% is achieved when using Active LeZi.