Lost in Space: A Case Study on Optimizing Student Spaces at the University of Virginia

Hayley Waleska, Caroline McNichols, Stefan Zachar, Torian Wright, Joshua Cauthen, Seshi Konu, M. DeDomenico, R. Bailey
{"title":"Lost in Space: A Case Study on Optimizing Student Spaces at the University of Virginia","authors":"Hayley Waleska, Caroline McNichols, Stefan Zachar, Torian Wright, Joshua Cauthen, Seshi Konu, M. DeDomenico, R. Bailey","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reservable student space is an essential resource for student organizations at universities. The ability to provide equitable access to spaces is a key role of the administration. The focus of this paper is a case study exploring mechanisms to improve both spaces and how students access them at the University of Virginia, taking a human-centered design approach to 1) analyzing the current system, 2) identifying, evaluating, and evolving recommendations to improve system performance, and 3) assessing impact of recommendations. Based on prior studies, usage data, surveys, interviews, and focus groups, we identified two driving questions: 1) Does the university have the needed spaces? 2) Are these spaces accessible by student groups? In response, the team developed a dual focus: Space Design and Utilization (SDU) to address the idea of “right spaces” and Reservation System Design (RSD) to address issues related to ease of access. SDU revealed issues with overly-strict policies and space design, a disparity in the spread of spaces across campus, and a shortage of spaces equipped to diverse student activity. To address these issues, we recommend the university audit its policies, focus future construction on creating hubs of space near student housing, and emphasize the ideal of multi-use space during new construction and renovations. RSD revealed a lack of procedural transparency leads to feelings of inequity between student groups, incorrect assumptions regarding users lead to dysfunctional interactions, and the system was not making optimal use of the limited spatial resources. To address issues, we recommend the university increase transparency through clear and consistent communication, refrain from making unjustified assumptions of users, and allocate spaces to proper events while allowing flexibility within spaces.","PeriodicalId":265421,"journal":{"name":"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reservable student space is an essential resource for student organizations at universities. The ability to provide equitable access to spaces is a key role of the administration. The focus of this paper is a case study exploring mechanisms to improve both spaces and how students access them at the University of Virginia, taking a human-centered design approach to 1) analyzing the current system, 2) identifying, evaluating, and evolving recommendations to improve system performance, and 3) assessing impact of recommendations. Based on prior studies, usage data, surveys, interviews, and focus groups, we identified two driving questions: 1) Does the university have the needed spaces? 2) Are these spaces accessible by student groups? In response, the team developed a dual focus: Space Design and Utilization (SDU) to address the idea of “right spaces” and Reservation System Design (RSD) to address issues related to ease of access. SDU revealed issues with overly-strict policies and space design, a disparity in the spread of spaces across campus, and a shortage of spaces equipped to diverse student activity. To address these issues, we recommend the university audit its policies, focus future construction on creating hubs of space near student housing, and emphasize the ideal of multi-use space during new construction and renovations. RSD revealed a lack of procedural transparency leads to feelings of inequity between student groups, incorrect assumptions regarding users lead to dysfunctional interactions, and the system was not making optimal use of the limited spatial resources. To address issues, we recommend the university increase transparency through clear and consistent communication, refrain from making unjustified assumptions of users, and allocate spaces to proper events while allowing flexibility within spaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迷失在空间:优化弗吉尼亚大学学生空间的案例研究
预留学生空间是大学学生组织的重要资源。提供公平使用空间的能力是行政部门的关键作用。本文的重点是一个案例研究,探索弗吉尼亚大学改善这两个空间的机制以及学生如何访问它们,采用以人为中心的设计方法来1)分析当前系统,2)识别、评估和发展建议以提高系统性能,3)评估建议的影响。基于之前的研究、使用数据、调查、访谈和焦点小组,我们确定了两个驱动问题:1)大学有所需的空间吗?2)这些空间是否可供学生团体使用?作为回应,该团队开发了双重重点:空间设计和利用(SDU)解决“合适的空间”的想法,预留系统设计(RSD)解决与方便访问相关的问题。SDU透露了过于严格的政策和空间设计问题,校园空间分布的差异,以及缺乏用于多样化学生活动的空间。为了解决这些问题,我们建议大学审查其政策,将未来的建设重点放在创造学生宿舍附近的空间中心上,并在新建和翻新时强调多功能空间的理想。RSD显示,程序透明度的缺乏导致学生群体之间的不平等感,对用户的错误假设导致交互功能失调,系统没有充分利用有限的空间资源。为了解决这些问题,我们建议大学通过清晰和一致的沟通来提高透明度,避免对用户做出不合理的假设,并为适当的活动分配空间,同时允许空间内的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things in the Transformation of E-Business Sector Gamification of eHealth Interventions to Increase User Engagement and Reduce Attrition Modeling User Context from Smartphone Data for Recognition of Health Status Developing a data pipeline to improve accessibility and utilization of Charlottesville's Open Data Portal Deep Learning for Detecting Diseases in Gastrointestinal Biopsy Images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1