Stress Testing Frameworks and Practices in Dual Banking System: A Preliminary Assessment

Muhamed Zulkhibri, A. Ismail
{"title":"Stress Testing Frameworks and Practices in Dual Banking System: A Preliminary Assessment","authors":"Muhamed Zulkhibri, A. Ismail","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3303696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper critically reviews and evaluates stress-testing frameworks and practices of supervisory authorities in a dual banking system namely Malaysia, Indonesia and Pakistan. The analysis suggests that similar to single banking system, there are two main designs to stress testing -bottom-up and top-down - depending on the institutional responsibilities and computational capabilities, while relying on two main techniques of stress tests, sensitivity tests and scenario tests (historical or hypothetical). None of these countries differentiates the stress testing design and approach between conventional and Islamic banking industry. The application of stress testing in these countries follows similar approach to conventional banking system. The analysis also suggests that stress-testing approach for Islamic banking system should be developed capturing the unique balance sheets structure and risks of Islamic banking so that it provides accurate assessments of vulnerability in the Islamic banking system.","PeriodicalId":373040,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Economic Studies (IES)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Economic Studies (IES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3303696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper critically reviews and evaluates stress-testing frameworks and practices of supervisory authorities in a dual banking system namely Malaysia, Indonesia and Pakistan. The analysis suggests that similar to single banking system, there are two main designs to stress testing -bottom-up and top-down - depending on the institutional responsibilities and computational capabilities, while relying on two main techniques of stress tests, sensitivity tests and scenario tests (historical or hypothetical). None of these countries differentiates the stress testing design and approach between conventional and Islamic banking industry. The application of stress testing in these countries follows similar approach to conventional banking system. The analysis also suggests that stress-testing approach for Islamic banking system should be developed capturing the unique balance sheets structure and risks of Islamic banking so that it provides accurate assessments of vulnerability in the Islamic banking system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双重银行体系的压力测试框架与实践:初步评估
本文批判性地审查和评估双重银行体系即马来西亚,印度尼西亚和巴基斯坦的监管当局的压力测试框架和做法。分析表明,与单一银行体系类似,根据机构责任和计算能力,压力测试有两种主要设计——自下而上和自上而下,同时依赖于压力测试的两种主要技术:敏感性测试和情景测试(历史或假设)。这些国家都没有区分传统银行业和伊斯兰银行业的压力测试设计和方法。压力测试在这些国家的应用遵循了与传统银行体系类似的方法。分析还表明,应该开发针对伊斯兰银行系统的压力测试方法,以捕捉伊斯兰银行独特的资产负债表结构和风险,以便对伊斯兰银行系统的脆弱性进行准确评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Growth and Financial Performance of Islamic Banks: A CAMELS Approach Organic Global Cryptocurrency: Towards a Stable International Monetary System that is Closer to Maqasid Sharıʿah Service Quality of Islamic Banks: Satisfaction, Loyalty and the Mediating Role of Trust The Business Financial Inclusion Benefits From an Islamic Point of View: A Qualitative Inquiry A Model of the Islamic Sovereign Wealth Fund
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1