Corporate/commercial speech and the marketplace first amendment: Whose right was it, anyway?

W. Bailey
{"title":"Corporate/commercial speech and the marketplace first amendment: Whose right was it, anyway?","authors":"W. Bailey","doi":"10.1080/10417949609373006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contrary to popular American myth, freedom of speech as a right of individuals in a participatory democracy is virtually nonexistent. As defined in Supreme Court case law, freedom of speech is conceived principally as the right of society to hear information. This essay argues that the collective right to hear, expressed as “the marketplace of ideas” is the portal through which corporate commercial/political speech entered and took over the marketplace of ideas. The symbiotic relationships between corporations, corporate media, and government enabled the takeover to be less than hostile. Short of social cataclysm, individual freedom of speech will probably play an increasingly diminished role in American public affairs.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"84 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949609373006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Contrary to popular American myth, freedom of speech as a right of individuals in a participatory democracy is virtually nonexistent. As defined in Supreme Court case law, freedom of speech is conceived principally as the right of society to hear information. This essay argues that the collective right to hear, expressed as “the marketplace of ideas” is the portal through which corporate commercial/political speech entered and took over the marketplace of ideas. The symbiotic relationships between corporations, corporate media, and government enabled the takeover to be less than hostile. Short of social cataclysm, individual freedom of speech will probably play an increasingly diminished role in American public affairs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业/商业言论和市场第一修正案:到底是谁的权利?
与流行的美国神话相反,作为参与式民主中个人权利的言论自由实际上是不存在的。根据最高法院判例法的定义,言论自由主要被认为是社会听取信息的权利。这篇文章认为,集体的倾听权,表达为“思想的市场”,是企业商业/政治言论进入并接管思想市场的门户。企业、企业媒体和政府之间的共生关系使得收购不那么充满敌意。如果没有社会巨变,个人言论自由在美国公共事务中的作用可能会越来越小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radio in a world at war Dramatic criticism 1 Attention forensics coaches Students’ perceptions of effective and ineffective communication by college teachers The woven gender: made for a woman, but stronger for a man
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1