360-degree feedback

A. Obholzer
{"title":"360-degree feedback","authors":"A. Obholzer","doi":"10.4324/9780429275630-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"360-degree feedback is a cornerstone and a best practice in successful leadership development programs. The process is developmental and is not tied to the annual performance review process. The process provides the program participant with comprehensive feedback regarding others' perceptions of his/her strengths and areas for development as they relate to Emory's Leadership Competencies. The feedback also provides the participant with additional information for development planning. The process involves collecting input from the manager, peers, direct reports, and \" others \" , as well as self-ratings by the participant. Delving Deeper The participant selects individuals that he/she interacts regularly and who he/she believes will be in a position to provide candid and valuable input that he/she can use to continue to develop his/her leadership skills. The participant will receive several types of feedback – all of which preserve the anonymity of those rating him/her, with the exception of the individual's manager. For each competency and each behavior rated the Participant receives:  overall average ratings (where the ratings of all raters combined)  average ratings by group o manager o peer o direct reports o \" others \"  self-rating However, there must be at least three respondents in a group (with the exception of the manager and self) for the participant to receive that group's average ratings. If there are fewer than three respondents in a group, the ratings are included in the overall averages, but not in a separate group average. Raters have the opportunity to provide qualitative feedback for each of the competencies, as well as to provide feedback on what they perceive to be the participant's overall greatest strength and greatest area for development. The participant receives a copy of the written comments; however, these comments are not separated by groups. Since the process is developmental, the participant is the only individual to receive a copy of the feedback report. The feedback report is provided to the participant during a detailed group feedback session. While the participant is expected to discuss the development plan that results from the feedback with","PeriodicalId":356053,"journal":{"name":"Workplace Intelligence","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workplace Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429275630-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

360-degree feedback is a cornerstone and a best practice in successful leadership development programs. The process is developmental and is not tied to the annual performance review process. The process provides the program participant with comprehensive feedback regarding others' perceptions of his/her strengths and areas for development as they relate to Emory's Leadership Competencies. The feedback also provides the participant with additional information for development planning. The process involves collecting input from the manager, peers, direct reports, and " others " , as well as self-ratings by the participant. Delving Deeper The participant selects individuals that he/she interacts regularly and who he/she believes will be in a position to provide candid and valuable input that he/she can use to continue to develop his/her leadership skills. The participant will receive several types of feedback – all of which preserve the anonymity of those rating him/her, with the exception of the individual's manager. For each competency and each behavior rated the Participant receives:  overall average ratings (where the ratings of all raters combined)  average ratings by group o manager o peer o direct reports o " others "  self-rating However, there must be at least three respondents in a group (with the exception of the manager and self) for the participant to receive that group's average ratings. If there are fewer than three respondents in a group, the ratings are included in the overall averages, but not in a separate group average. Raters have the opportunity to provide qualitative feedback for each of the competencies, as well as to provide feedback on what they perceive to be the participant's overall greatest strength and greatest area for development. The participant receives a copy of the written comments; however, these comments are not separated by groups. Since the process is developmental, the participant is the only individual to receive a copy of the feedback report. The feedback report is provided to the participant during a detailed group feedback session. While the participant is expected to discuss the development plan that results from the feedback with
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
360度反馈
360度反馈是成功的领导力发展项目的基石和最佳实践。该过程是发展性的,与年度绩效评估过程无关。这个过程为项目参与者提供了全面的反馈,关于其他人对他/她的优势和发展领域的看法,因为它们与埃默里大学的领导能力有关。反馈还为参与者提供了发展规划的额外信息。这个过程包括从经理、同事、直接下属和“其他人”那里收集输入,以及参与者的自我评价。参与者选择他/她经常互动的人,他/她认为他/她将能够提供坦诚和有价值的意见,他/她可以利用这些意见继续发展他/她的领导技能。参与者将收到几种类型的反馈——除了个人的经理之外,所有这些反馈都保留了对他/她进行评级的匿名性。对于每一项能力和每一种行为,参与者获得:·总体平均评分(所有评分者的评分总和)·由组或经理、同行、直接报告或“其他人”的平均评分·自我评分然而,一个组中必须至少有三个受访者(除了经理和自己),参与者才能获得该组的平均评分。如果在一个组中有少于3个应答者,则评级包含在总体平均值中,但不包含在单独的组平均值中。评分者有机会为每一项能力提供定性的反馈,也有机会对他们认为是参与者总体上最大的优势和最大的发展领域提供反馈。参赛者收到书面评论的副本;然而,这些评论并没有被分组分开。由于这个过程是发展的,参与者是唯一一个收到反馈报告副本的人。反馈报告在详细的小组反馈会议期间提供给参与者。而参与者则需要讨论从反馈中得出的开发计划
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion Counselling, therapy, and psychoanalysis Mentoring The workforce and its make-up On listening
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1