The Effect of Checklist in Code Review for Inexperienced Students: An Empirical Study

Guoping Rong, Jingyi Li, Mingjuan Xie, Tao Zheng
{"title":"The Effect of Checklist in Code Review for Inexperienced Students: An Empirical Study","authors":"Guoping Rong, Jingyi Li, Mingjuan Xie, Tao Zheng","doi":"10.1109/CSEET.2012.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code review is believed to be an effective technique to remove defects in early development stage and improve software quality. Therefore, it is regarded as one of the basic skills of qualified software engineers. Consequently, most curricula for SE students incorporated knowledge about code review in different courses. However, how to teach students to conduct efficient code review remains challenging. Many reports claimed that using checklist during code review could increase review efficiency (percentage of defects removed in code review). Nevertheless, we found a quite different result through analyzing the data collected from a PSP course took by freshmen. Results indicate that checklist contributes more to helping beginners conduct code review than to improving review efficiency. This finding implies that educators need to properly recognize the role of checklist in code review for students and explore more approaches to help students master skills to conduct efficient code reviews.","PeriodicalId":385043,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE 25th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE 25th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2012.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Code review is believed to be an effective technique to remove defects in early development stage and improve software quality. Therefore, it is regarded as one of the basic skills of qualified software engineers. Consequently, most curricula for SE students incorporated knowledge about code review in different courses. However, how to teach students to conduct efficient code review remains challenging. Many reports claimed that using checklist during code review could increase review efficiency (percentage of defects removed in code review). Nevertheless, we found a quite different result through analyzing the data collected from a PSP course took by freshmen. Results indicate that checklist contributes more to helping beginners conduct code review than to improving review efficiency. This finding implies that educators need to properly recognize the role of checklist in code review for students and explore more approaches to help students master skills to conduct efficient code reviews.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检查表在初中生代码复习中的作用:一项实证研究
代码审查被认为是一种在开发早期消除缺陷和提高软件质量的有效技术。因此,它被认为是合格软件工程师的基本技能之一。因此,大多数面向SE学生的课程都在不同的课程中加入了关于代码审查的知识。然而,如何教学生进行有效的代码审查仍然是一个挑战。许多报告声称在代码审查期间使用检查表可以提高审查效率(代码审查中删除缺陷的百分比)。然而,通过对大一新生PSP课程的数据分析,我们发现了一个完全不同的结果。结果表明,检查表对帮助初学者进行代码审查的贡献大于对提高审查效率的贡献。这一发现意味着教育工作者需要正确地认识到检查表在学生代码审查中的作用,并探索更多的方法来帮助学生掌握进行有效代码审查的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Study of Group Communication Patterns in a Large Project Software Engineering Course A Gentle Introduction to Learn by Doing Experiences with Integrating Simulation into a Software Engineering Curriculum Changes in Transferable Knowledge Resulting from Study in a Graduate Software Engineering Curriculum An Experience of Teaching HCI to Undergraduate Software Engineering Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1