Evaluating the pertinence of foreign languages (German, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Italian) in Cameroon’s education curriculum: needs for reform of the curriculum and language in education policy

Herbert Rostand Ngouo
{"title":"Evaluating the pertinence of foreign languages (German, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Italian) in Cameroon’s education curriculum: needs for reform of the curriculum and language in education policy","authors":"Herbert Rostand Ngouo","doi":"10.48185/she.v3i1.452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ongoing debate regarding the decolonisation of Africa should focus primarily on the domain of education, as ideologies about languages are reflected, implemented and reproduced in the language in education policy (LIEP) of a country. Most African countries have inherited the Western monolingual LIEPs and have given prevalence to ex-colonial languages as official languages of education, media, and administration. Some countries, like Cameroon (host to more than 270 African languages), have gone beyond preferring French and English as a medium of instruction, adding more foreign languages (German, Spanish, Chinese, Italian, and Arabic) in secondary schools and universities, to the detriment of national languages. Most studies on language policy address the issue of language as a medium of instruction and neglect to critically evaluate the pertinence and relevance of the generalised teaching/learning of foreign languages in schools and universities in Cameroon. This study looks at the connection between teaching foreign languages and Cameroonians' transnational aspirations. The data were collected from discussions on two Facebook threads about the topic, discussions with lecturers of foreign languages at university, and a meta-synthesis analysis of existing statistics about international migration for educational purposes. The findings reveal that inbound international migration flux is associated with language but is not the most crucial factor. As a result, the study suggests either suppressing the generalised teaching of foreign languages in the francophone subsystem of education and setting up a public-private partnership or at least suppressing the Spanish and Italian languages whose knowledge has not provided any direct benefit for the majority of the learner. The cost of running those languages is not equivalent to the return.","PeriodicalId":143917,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Humanities and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Humanities and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48185/she.v3i1.452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The ongoing debate regarding the decolonisation of Africa should focus primarily on the domain of education, as ideologies about languages are reflected, implemented and reproduced in the language in education policy (LIEP) of a country. Most African countries have inherited the Western monolingual LIEPs and have given prevalence to ex-colonial languages as official languages of education, media, and administration. Some countries, like Cameroon (host to more than 270 African languages), have gone beyond preferring French and English as a medium of instruction, adding more foreign languages (German, Spanish, Chinese, Italian, and Arabic) in secondary schools and universities, to the detriment of national languages. Most studies on language policy address the issue of language as a medium of instruction and neglect to critically evaluate the pertinence and relevance of the generalised teaching/learning of foreign languages in schools and universities in Cameroon. This study looks at the connection between teaching foreign languages and Cameroonians' transnational aspirations. The data were collected from discussions on two Facebook threads about the topic, discussions with lecturers of foreign languages at university, and a meta-synthesis analysis of existing statistics about international migration for educational purposes. The findings reveal that inbound international migration flux is associated with language but is not the most crucial factor. As a result, the study suggests either suppressing the generalised teaching of foreign languages in the francophone subsystem of education and setting up a public-private partnership or at least suppressing the Spanish and Italian languages whose knowledge has not provided any direct benefit for the majority of the learner. The cost of running those languages is not equivalent to the return.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价外语(德语、西班牙语、阿拉伯语、汉语、意大利语)在喀麦隆教育课程中的针对性:课程和教育政策语言改革的需要
正在进行的关于非洲非殖民化的辩论应主要集中在教育领域,因为关于语言的意识形态在一个国家的语言教育政策(LIEP)中得到反映、实施和复制。大多数非洲国家都继承了西方的单语liep,并普遍采用前殖民地语言作为教育、媒体和行政的官方语言。一些国家,如喀麦隆(拥有超过270种非洲语言),不仅更喜欢法语和英语作为教学媒介,还在中学和大学中增加了更多的外语(德语、西班牙语、汉语、意大利语和阿拉伯语),损害了本国语言。大多数关于语言政策的研究都涉及语言作为教学媒介的问题,而忽视了批判性地评估喀麦隆中小学和大学中普遍的外语教学的针对性和相关性。这项研究着眼于外语教学与喀麦隆人的跨国愿望之间的联系。数据收集自Facebook上关于这个话题的两个讨论,与大学外语讲师的讨论,以及对现有国际移民教育统计数据的综合分析。研究结果表明,入境国际移民的流动与语言有关,但不是最关键的因素。因此,该研究建议,要么在法语教育子系统中压制外语的普遍教学,并建立公私合作伙伴关系,要么至少压制西班牙语和意大利语,这些语言的知识并没有为大多数学习者提供任何直接的好处。运行这些语言的成本并不等于回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alternative Assessment in L2 Writing Classes: Tunisian EFL Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices The Receptive Vocabulary Size of Vocational Trainees at the Specialized Institute of Applied Technology in Morocco The Influence of Closeness on Japanese-English Translation Tenacious Displacement of Home in Mohamed Dellal’s “When the Wind of the Atlas Blows” Exploring Perspectives and Reform Dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1