Perception of smile esthetics among dental and nondental students

Hanan Omar, Y. T. Tai
{"title":"Perception of smile esthetics among dental and nondental students","authors":"Hanan Omar, Y. T. Tai","doi":"10.4103/0974-7761.148986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dental students in their clinical years are part of the dental workforce. The ability of the graduate to identify patient′s aesthetic requirements and determine the degree to which those requirements or desires can be met is one of the new dentist′s competencies. The perception of dental students toward some esthetic factors of smile was investigated and compared to that of pharmacy students in the same university. Materials and Methods: The authors developed a booklet of smile comprised of an ideal smile and seven altered smiles involving change in shade, shape, width and length of teeth in addition to midline shift and change in the gingival display. Students rated ideal smile and altered smiles using a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS). Results: The study involved 198 students; 108 dental students and 89 pharmacy students and 131 females and 66 males. Mean values for the VAS for the ideal smile were 72, 66 for dental and pharmacy students, respectively. While the mean values for the altered smiles varied between 23 and 65. Ideal smile was rated significantly higher by dental students (P = 0.015) Dental students rated midline shift change in gingival display, alteration in size and shape significantly lower than pharmacy students. While no significant difference was detected between the pharmacy students′ ratings of the ideal smile and alterations in shape, size, clinical crown and gingival display. Conclusion: Dental students are more receptive to smile alterations. Dental students appreciated the ideal smile more than pharmacy students. Darker tooth shades, spacing and midline shift were least accepted by both dental and pharmacy students. Dental students were more sensitive to changes in gingival display, crown length, lateral incisors width and shape while pharmacy students were more tolerant to these changes.","PeriodicalId":348927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Ethics in Dentistry","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Ethics in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7761.148986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Background: Dental students in their clinical years are part of the dental workforce. The ability of the graduate to identify patient′s aesthetic requirements and determine the degree to which those requirements or desires can be met is one of the new dentist′s competencies. The perception of dental students toward some esthetic factors of smile was investigated and compared to that of pharmacy students in the same university. Materials and Methods: The authors developed a booklet of smile comprised of an ideal smile and seven altered smiles involving change in shade, shape, width and length of teeth in addition to midline shift and change in the gingival display. Students rated ideal smile and altered smiles using a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS). Results: The study involved 198 students; 108 dental students and 89 pharmacy students and 131 females and 66 males. Mean values for the VAS for the ideal smile were 72, 66 for dental and pharmacy students, respectively. While the mean values for the altered smiles varied between 23 and 65. Ideal smile was rated significantly higher by dental students (P = 0.015) Dental students rated midline shift change in gingival display, alteration in size and shape significantly lower than pharmacy students. While no significant difference was detected between the pharmacy students′ ratings of the ideal smile and alterations in shape, size, clinical crown and gingival display. Conclusion: Dental students are more receptive to smile alterations. Dental students appreciated the ideal smile more than pharmacy students. Darker tooth shades, spacing and midline shift were least accepted by both dental and pharmacy students. Dental students were more sensitive to changes in gingival display, crown length, lateral incisors width and shape while pharmacy students were more tolerant to these changes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙科与非牙科学生对微笑美学的认知
背景:牙科学生在他们的临床年是牙科劳动力的一部分。毕业生识别病人的审美要求并确定满足这些要求或愿望的程度的能力是新牙医的能力之一。调查了牙科专业学生对微笑的一些审美因素的感知,并与同一所大学药学专业学生进行了比较。材料和方法:作者开发了一本微笑手册,包括一个理想的微笑和七种改变的微笑,包括改变牙齿的阴影,形状,宽度和长度,以及中线移动和牙龈显示的变化。学生们用100分的视觉模拟量表(VAS)对理想笑容和改变后的笑容进行打分。结果:研究共涉及198名学生;牙科学生108人,药剂学学生89人,女生131人,男生66人。牙科和药学学生的理想笑容VAS平均值分别为72,66。而改变笑容的平均值在23到65之间。牙科专业学生对理想微笑的评分显著高于药学专业学生(P = 0.015),而牙科专业学生对牙龈显示中线偏移、大小和形状改变的评分显著低于药学专业学生。而药学专业的学生对理想笑容的评分与形状、大小、临床牙冠和牙龈显示的变化之间没有显著差异。结论:牙科学生更容易接受笑容的改变。牙科专业的学生比药学专业的学生更欣赏理想的微笑。较深的牙齿颜色,间距和中线移位是最不被牙科和药学学生接受的。牙科专业学生对牙龈显示、牙冠长度、侧切牙宽度和形状的变化更为敏感,药学专业学生对这些变化的耐受性更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcome evaluation of faculty development program for dental educators: A questionnaire survey Medical skills training for undergraduate dental students An ethical awareness among dental interns in dental practice Ethical issues in dentist–patient interactions A comparative study for the evaluation of self-medication practices among dental students in a tertiary care dental teaching institute in Delhi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1