Concurrent cognitive processing and letter sequence transcription deficits in stutterers.

W G Webster
{"title":"Concurrent cognitive processing and letter sequence transcription deficits in stutterers.","authors":"W G Webster","doi":"10.1037/h0084238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has indicated that men who stutter transcribe rapidly presented sequences of letters more slowly and less accurately than nonstutterer controls. Experiment 1 demonstrated that the transcription deficit is not limited to task conditions that demand concurrent monitoring and responding. This was evidenced by comparable deficits on a successive response condition that required subjects to write letters after the presentation was complete. The results of Experiment 2 indicated that the deficit is not due to a difficulty by stutterers in parsing streams of stimulus information internally. Their performance did not differentially improve when letters were grouped with brief pauses, nor with experience in transcribing preparsed letter sequences. This experiment also demonstrated that the phenomenon is generalizable to women. In related testing, stutterers were slower than controls in writing internally generated sequences of letters, those of the alphabet forwards and backwards, but not in writing the same two letters, A and B, repetitively nor in the cognitively more demanding task of writing numbers backwards by three's. These results parallel those obtained with finger tapping of same versus unique sequences by stutterers and were interpreted as being consistent with the idea that while stutterers are not generally slower motorically than nonstutterers, they experience difficulty when required to organize and carry out tasks with new multiple response transitions. The two experiments have replicated and extended, under different conditions, the earlier findings of a letter sequence transcription deficit in stutterers, but the nature of the interference still remains to be clarified.</p>","PeriodicalId":75671,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of psychology","volume":"44 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/h0084238","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Previous research has indicated that men who stutter transcribe rapidly presented sequences of letters more slowly and less accurately than nonstutterer controls. Experiment 1 demonstrated that the transcription deficit is not limited to task conditions that demand concurrent monitoring and responding. This was evidenced by comparable deficits on a successive response condition that required subjects to write letters after the presentation was complete. The results of Experiment 2 indicated that the deficit is not due to a difficulty by stutterers in parsing streams of stimulus information internally. Their performance did not differentially improve when letters were grouped with brief pauses, nor with experience in transcribing preparsed letter sequences. This experiment also demonstrated that the phenomenon is generalizable to women. In related testing, stutterers were slower than controls in writing internally generated sequences of letters, those of the alphabet forwards and backwards, but not in writing the same two letters, A and B, repetitively nor in the cognitively more demanding task of writing numbers backwards by three's. These results parallel those obtained with finger tapping of same versus unique sequences by stutterers and were interpreted as being consistent with the idea that while stutterers are not generally slower motorically than nonstutterers, they experience difficulty when required to organize and carry out tasks with new multiple response transitions. The two experiments have replicated and extended, under different conditions, the earlier findings of a letter sequence transcription deficit in stutterers, but the nature of the interference still remains to be clarified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口吃者并发认知加工和字母序列转录缺陷。
先前的研究表明,与非口吃者相比,口吃者快速转录字母序列的速度更慢,准确性也更低。实验1表明,转录缺陷并不局限于需要同时监测和响应的任务条件。在连续反应条件下,要求受试者在演示完成后写信,这证明了这一点。实验2的结果表明,口吃者在内部分析刺激信息流方面存在困难,而这一缺陷并非由口吃者自身的困难造成的。当字母与短暂的停顿组合在一起时,他们的表现没有差异,也没有转录准备好的字母序列的经验。这个实验也证明了这种现象在女性身上也是普遍存在的。在相关的测试中,口吃者在书写内部生成的字母序列(向前和向后书写字母)方面比对照组慢,但在重复书写相同的两个字母A和B方面没有慢,在向后写三个数字的认知要求更高的任务中也没有慢。这些结果与口吃者用相同或独特的顺序敲击手指得到的结果相似,并被解释为与这样的观点一致,即尽管口吃者在运动上并不比非口吃者慢,但当要求他们组织和执行具有新的多重反应转换的任务时,他们会遇到困难。这两个实验在不同条件下复制并扩展了早期发现的口吃者的字母序列转录缺陷,但这种干扰的性质仍有待澄清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La langue et les Lèvres: cross-language influences on bimodal speech perception. Neural and behavioural effects of domoic acid, an amnesic shellfish toxin, in the rat. Object identification in context: the visual processing of natural scenes. Eye movements and scene perception. Parallel pattern processing and visual agnosia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1