Nationalism and the issue of nation-building in the nineteenth century’s Georgian political thought

Salome Dundua
{"title":"Nationalism and the issue of nation-building in the nineteenth century’s Georgian political thought","authors":"Salome Dundua","doi":"10.2478/pn-2018-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, we discuss two different directions about the Georgian nationalism of the 19th century: first we consider, thetrinity of language, homeland, faith – maybe one of the best classical formulations of nationalist project. And second, in the process of creation of the nation, in the course of research of the Georgian nation-building of that period, we can not avoid the role of printed media. Georgian intellectuals published their opinions on general internal problems or foreign policy processes and all the most important ideas expressed by them were widespread by the printed media. Under strict censorship, discussing foreign policy processes was an indirect way to disclose the attitudes of Georgian intellectuals to the building Georgian nation, restoration of state, territorial integrity and independence, as well as to the colonial politics in generall. “Let’s be self-sufficient” is a phrase best describing the main purpose of Georgian intellectuals. However, it is noteworthy that the creators of that time Georgian nationalismprimarily sought to gain autonomy within the Russian Empire, while full political independence was due to the reality a far and difficult goal. Generally, Georgian nationalism developed during that period was clearly mild and was far from ethno-cultural discrimination that is o”en characteristic for nationalism.","PeriodicalId":256970,"journal":{"name":"Review of Nationalities","volume":"17 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Nationalities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pn-2018-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we discuss two different directions about the Georgian nationalism of the 19th century: first we consider, thetrinity of language, homeland, faith – maybe one of the best classical formulations of nationalist project. And second, in the process of creation of the nation, in the course of research of the Georgian nation-building of that period, we can not avoid the role of printed media. Georgian intellectuals published their opinions on general internal problems or foreign policy processes and all the most important ideas expressed by them were widespread by the printed media. Under strict censorship, discussing foreign policy processes was an indirect way to disclose the attitudes of Georgian intellectuals to the building Georgian nation, restoration of state, territorial integrity and independence, as well as to the colonial politics in generall. “Let’s be self-sufficient” is a phrase best describing the main purpose of Georgian intellectuals. However, it is noteworthy that the creators of that time Georgian nationalismprimarily sought to gain autonomy within the Russian Empire, while full political independence was due to the reality a far and difficult goal. Generally, Georgian nationalism developed during that period was clearly mild and was far from ethno-cultural discrimination that is o”en characteristic for nationalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
19世纪格鲁吉亚政治思想中的民族主义与国家建设问题
本文讨论了19世纪格鲁吉亚民族主义的两个不同方向:首先,我们认为语言、家园、信仰三位一体——这可能是民族主义计划的最佳经典表述之一。其次,在格鲁吉亚建国的过程中,在研究这一时期格鲁吉亚国家建设的过程中,我们无法回避印刷媒体的作用。格鲁吉亚知识分子发表了他们对一般国内问题或外交政策进程的意见,他们所表达的所有最重要的观点都通过印刷媒体广为传播。在严格的审查制度下,讨论外交政策过程是一种间接的方式,可以揭示格鲁吉亚知识分子对格鲁吉亚民族建设、国家恢复、领土完整和独立以及总体上的殖民政治的态度。“让我们自给自足”这句话最好地描述了格鲁吉亚知识分子的主要目的。然而,值得注意的是,当时格鲁吉亚民族主义的创造者主要是寻求在俄罗斯帝国内获得自治,而完全的政治独立是一个遥远而困难的目标。总的说来,在这一时期发展起来的格鲁吉亚民族主义显然是温和的,远非民族主义所特有的种族文化歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Catalan legal acts and documents related to the region’s independence process in the context of the radicalization of independentism. Selected examples from 2012–2017 How do SISTERS IN ISLAM struggle with perception of Muslim women in Malaysian society? Gezi Park analysis as an example of social movement Andrzej Dwojnych, Rafał Łętocha, W stronę Królestwa Bożego na ziemi. Myśl społeczno-polityczna mariawitów polskich, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2021, pp. 422 Polish autonomous nationalism against the background of social movement theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1