System Safety in Healthcare

D. Raheja, M. Escano
{"title":"System Safety in Healthcare","authors":"D. Raheja, M. Escano","doi":"10.56094/jss.v55i3.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unsafe work practices can happen in many ways. The following lengthy list includes examples of potential causes: \n \nExcessive work for clinicians \nToo many unnecessary reports and requirements \nOver-dependence on technology \nConflict between the need for professional autonomy and establishing the dynamically changing best processes \nCare delivery “silos” resulting from lack of interdepartmental teamwork \nConstant distractions and interruptions \nToo many policies and procedures, leading to a tendency to follow marginally effective methods \nOver-reliance on electronic medical tracking taking precedence over bedside discussions with patients \nInattention to detail \nLack of motivation to get, or resources for, a second opinion \nQuick diagnosis based on past observations \nInadequate attention to medical equipment dangers \nInsufficient effort in infection prevention \nPeople pretending the negative would not happen to them \nHospitals looking for quick profit \nQuestionable alternate boards certifying physicians who may not be qualified \nA lack of passion for work \nUnfavorable workflows, such as labs located far from the emergency department \nA lack of clarity of what is required to assure patient safety \nToo much team consensus instead of challenging the quality of intervention \n","PeriodicalId":250838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of System Safety","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56094/jss.v55i3.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unsafe work practices can happen in many ways. The following lengthy list includes examples of potential causes: Excessive work for clinicians Too many unnecessary reports and requirements Over-dependence on technology Conflict between the need for professional autonomy and establishing the dynamically changing best processes Care delivery “silos” resulting from lack of interdepartmental teamwork Constant distractions and interruptions Too many policies and procedures, leading to a tendency to follow marginally effective methods Over-reliance on electronic medical tracking taking precedence over bedside discussions with patients Inattention to detail Lack of motivation to get, or resources for, a second opinion Quick diagnosis based on past observations Inadequate attention to medical equipment dangers Insufficient effort in infection prevention People pretending the negative would not happen to them Hospitals looking for quick profit Questionable alternate boards certifying physicians who may not be qualified A lack of passion for work Unfavorable workflows, such as labs located far from the emergency department A lack of clarity of what is required to assure patient safety Too much team consensus instead of challenging the quality of intervention
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健系统安全
不安全的工作方式可能以多种方式发生。下面列举了一些可能的原因:临床医生的工作量过大不必要的报告和需求太多对技术的过度依赖专业自主的需求和建立动态变化的最佳流程之间的冲突缺乏部门间的团队合作导致护理服务的“孤岛”不断分心和中断过多的政策和程序导致倾向于采用无效的方法过度依赖电子医疗跟踪,优先于与患者的床边讨论不注意细节缺乏获得或资源的动力第二种意见根据过去的观察快速诊断对医疗设备的危险不够重视对感染预防的努力不够假装阴性不会发生在他们身上医院寻求快速利润可疑的替代委员会认证可能不合格的医生缺乏工作热情不利的工作流程例如,远离急诊科的实验室缺乏确保患者安全的明确要求。太多的团队共识,而不是挑战干预的质量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proposing the Use of Hazard Analysis for Machine Learning Data Sets Review of the Latest Developments in Automotive Safety Standardization for Driving Automation Systems Human Reliability Analysis using a Human Factors Hazard Model Incremental Assurance Through Eliminative Argumentation System Safety Bookshelf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1