Disorderly Conduct: Women’s Health and Women’s Rights (1883-1930)

Karen DeClaire
{"title":"Disorderly Conduct: Women’s Health and Women’s Rights (1883-1930)","authors":"Karen DeClaire","doi":"10.32473/ufjur.24.130804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Victorian Era (1837-1901) is stereotypically characterized by propriety and sexual repression. Yet, during this time conduct literature for girls containing information on sex education as well as care for one’s body was widely circulated and read in response to fears over the spread of promiscuity, STDs, and prostitution. The authors of this literature exhibit acknowledgement of the need for women’s education on sexual hygiene rather than previously-enforced ignorance, and they also defined aspects of femininity and motherhood in tandem with sexuality in an effort to guide girls on “proper” womanhood. These books reinforced and shaped thought on gender roles which appear to have had persisting influence on the movements for female suffrage and labor rights that continued into the twentieth century. I investigate this issue using two conduct books as well as material from the collection of labor activist Margaret Dreier Robins (1868-1945). This investigation exposed many common values between the former medium and Robins’s reform efforts as head of the National Women’s Trade Union League, such as the importance of a gender-defined society, the centrality of collectivism and motherhood to the definition of femininity, as well as the harmful endorsement of eugenics in the production of healthy and democratic future generations. By comparing this literature, this paper begins to gather evidence on how the messaging of this conduct literature internalized in childhood could have shaped the direction of the progressive women’s movement.","PeriodicalId":278243,"journal":{"name":"UF Journal of Undergraduate Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UF Journal of Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32473/ufjur.24.130804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Victorian Era (1837-1901) is stereotypically characterized by propriety and sexual repression. Yet, during this time conduct literature for girls containing information on sex education as well as care for one’s body was widely circulated and read in response to fears over the spread of promiscuity, STDs, and prostitution. The authors of this literature exhibit acknowledgement of the need for women’s education on sexual hygiene rather than previously-enforced ignorance, and they also defined aspects of femininity and motherhood in tandem with sexuality in an effort to guide girls on “proper” womanhood. These books reinforced and shaped thought on gender roles which appear to have had persisting influence on the movements for female suffrage and labor rights that continued into the twentieth century. I investigate this issue using two conduct books as well as material from the collection of labor activist Margaret Dreier Robins (1868-1945). This investigation exposed many common values between the former medium and Robins’s reform efforts as head of the National Women’s Trade Union League, such as the importance of a gender-defined society, the centrality of collectivism and motherhood to the definition of femininity, as well as the harmful endorsement of eugenics in the production of healthy and democratic future generations. By comparing this literature, this paper begins to gather evidence on how the messaging of this conduct literature internalized in childhood could have shaped the direction of the progressive women’s movement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为不检:妇女健康与妇女权利(1883-1930)
维多利亚时代(1837-1901)的典型特征是礼仪和性压抑。然而,在这段时间里,为了应对滥交、性传播疾病和卖淫的蔓延,针对女孩的行为文学广泛传播和阅读,其中包含了性教育和身体护理方面的信息。这些文献的作者承认女性需要接受性卫生教育,而不是以前强制的无知,他们还将女性气质和母性的各个方面与性联系在一起,努力指导女孩们“正确”的女性气质。这些书加强和塑造了关于性别角色的思想,这似乎对持续到20世纪的女性选举权和劳工权利运动产生了持续的影响。我使用两本行为书籍以及劳工活动家玛格丽特·德雷尔·罗宾斯(1868-1945)收集的材料来研究这个问题。这项调查揭示了在前媒体和罗宾斯作为全国妇女工会联盟主席的改革努力之间的许多共同价值观,例如性别界定的社会的重要性,集体主义和母性对女性定义的中心地位,以及在生产健康和民主的后代方面对优生学的有害认可。通过比较这些文献,本文开始收集证据,证明童年时期内化的这种行为文献的信息如何塑造了进步妇女运动的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
University Faculty Perceptions of Climate Change in U.S. Evaluating Spatial Filtering on Diffusion MRI Data Harmonization in Parkinsonism Examining Language Interactivity Through Classifier Masked Primes in Chinese-English Bilinguals Predicting the future of mental health: (how) will in utero COVID-19 infection influence psychiatric illness in future generations?  Nazi Conspirator, Russian Patriot: Judging General Andrei Vlasov
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1