Analysis of results in dependability benchmarking: Can we do better?

Miquel Martínez, D. Andrés, J. Ruiz, Jesus Friginal
{"title":"Analysis of results in dependability benchmarking: Can we do better?","authors":"Miquel Martínez, D. Andrés, J. Ruiz, Jesus Friginal","doi":"10.1109/IWMN.2013.6663790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dependability benchmarking has become through the years more and more important in the process of systems evaluation. The increasing need for making systems more dependable in presence of perturbations has contributed to this fact. Nevertheless, even though many studies have focused on different areas related to dependability benchmarking, and some others have focused on the need of providing these benchmarks with good quality measures, there is still a gap in the process of the analysis of results. This paper focuses on providing a first glance at different approaches that may help filling this gap by making explicit the criteria followed in the decision making process.","PeriodicalId":218660,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements & Networking (M&N)","volume":"249 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements & Networking (M&N)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWMN.2013.6663790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Dependability benchmarking has become through the years more and more important in the process of systems evaluation. The increasing need for making systems more dependable in presence of perturbations has contributed to this fact. Nevertheless, even though many studies have focused on different areas related to dependability benchmarking, and some others have focused on the need of providing these benchmarks with good quality measures, there is still a gap in the process of the analysis of results. This paper focuses on providing a first glance at different approaches that may help filling this gap by making explicit the criteria followed in the decision making process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可靠性基准测试结果分析:我们能做得更好吗?
多年来,可靠性基准测试在系统评估过程中变得越来越重要。对使系统在存在扰动时更加可靠的日益增长的需求促成了这一事实。然而,尽管许多研究侧重于与可靠性基准相关的不同领域,也有一些研究侧重于需要为这些基准提供良好的质量措施,但在结果分析过程中仍然存在差距。本文的重点是通过明确决策过程中遵循的标准,提供对不同方法的初步了解,这些方法可能有助于填补这一空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficient bandwidth allocation scheme for wireless networks using relay stations Evaluation and possible improvements of the ANT protocol for home heart monitoring applications Low-power communication protocol for low duty cycle data acquisition applications Routing update period in Cognitive Radio Ad Hoc Networks Detecting misbehaviour in WiFi using multi-layer metric data fusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1