The Relation Between Serum CEA Response and the CTscan Finding After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Patients

S. Alasari, Alaa S. Abduljabbar, N. Al‐Sanea, S. Alhomoud, L. Ashari, K. Balaraj
{"title":"The Relation Between Serum CEA Response and the CTscan Finding After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Patients","authors":"S. Alasari, Alaa S. Abduljabbar, N. Al‐Sanea, S. Alhomoud, L. Ashari, K. Balaraj","doi":"10.2174/1876820201205010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) levels are the most widely used tumor marker for colorectal cancer. Elevated serum CEA has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of relapse and poor patient outcome. Whether this marker would be altered with preoperative adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer prior to resection and can this alteration reflect any changes in the tumor have not been yet investigated. If so, this might guide us to predict curative from palliative resection and to correlate between the marker level and future tumor response to the adjuvant therapy. Aim: This review was undertaken to assess the effect of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy on serum CEA level and the re- lationship between these effect on CEA and changes of the tumor in CT scan in advanced rectal cancer patient before de- finitive surgery. Methods: Between January 2002 and October 2007, a retrospective review using the colorectal database for all rectal can- cer patients treated in King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center was performed. All patients received preopera- tive long course radiotherapy alone, or combined with 5- fluorouracil. Serum CEA and CT scan was done for the patients before starting the neoadjuvant therapy, and repeated again prior to surgery. Surgical resection was planned 6 - 8 weeks following the completion of treatment. We determined the criteria of the tumor response in the CT scan findings and compared the results with the CEA level after the neoadjuvant therapy. Results: Out-off the 77 patients, 38 received radiotherapy alone, while 39 patients received chemoradiotherapy, CT scan was done for all patients in both groups (pre and post neoajuvent therapy). Patients divided into 2 groups based on the CT scan findings to: CT responder and CT non-responder patients. In the radiation only group, 21 (55 %) patients had raised CEA levels before the treatment, 18 (86%) of them showed a decrease in CEA with CT response, while 3(14%) patients' demonstrated further increase and CT non-response. 17(45%) patients with normal CEA. 15 (89%) of them showed normal CEA post treatment 12 (80%) of them showed CT response and 3 of them shows CT non-response. 2/17 (11%) patients showed further increase in CEA level and CT non-response as well. In the chemoradiotherapy group, 17 (43%) patients had high CEA level before the treatment. 16 (95%) of them showed a decrease in CEA and CT response while 1(5%) patient showed increase in CEA level and CT non-response post treat- ment. 22/39(57%) showed normal CEA where all of them remained in normal level post treatment and only 1 patient (5%) showed CT non-response. All patients with CEA and CT scan response are operable patients and we can consider them for curative resection, while all patients with CEA and CT scan non response are non operable or can get a palliative treatment due to ( metastasis or carcinomatosis). 4 patients of normal CEA post treatment CT scan shows ( increase in thickening and single new lesion in the liver with suspicious of metastasis ) but still operable patients with intension to cure. Conclusions: There is an obvious relation between serum CEA level and CT scan findings during neoadjuvant therapy. CEA level post neoadjuvent therapy can differentiate between operable and non operable patients. CT scan can be used for patients with increase CEA level as further investigation before surgery and can be eliminated for those with CEA normal or dropped level. Further studies are needed to correlate this finding with post operative histopathological finding and patient outcome","PeriodicalId":331708,"journal":{"name":"The Open Colorectal Cancer Journal","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Colorectal Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876820201205010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) levels are the most widely used tumor marker for colorectal cancer. Elevated serum CEA has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of relapse and poor patient outcome. Whether this marker would be altered with preoperative adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer prior to resection and can this alteration reflect any changes in the tumor have not been yet investigated. If so, this might guide us to predict curative from palliative resection and to correlate between the marker level and future tumor response to the adjuvant therapy. Aim: This review was undertaken to assess the effect of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy on serum CEA level and the re- lationship between these effect on CEA and changes of the tumor in CT scan in advanced rectal cancer patient before de- finitive surgery. Methods: Between January 2002 and October 2007, a retrospective review using the colorectal database for all rectal can- cer patients treated in King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center was performed. All patients received preopera- tive long course radiotherapy alone, or combined with 5- fluorouracil. Serum CEA and CT scan was done for the patients before starting the neoadjuvant therapy, and repeated again prior to surgery. Surgical resection was planned 6 - 8 weeks following the completion of treatment. We determined the criteria of the tumor response in the CT scan findings and compared the results with the CEA level after the neoadjuvant therapy. Results: Out-off the 77 patients, 38 received radiotherapy alone, while 39 patients received chemoradiotherapy, CT scan was done for all patients in both groups (pre and post neoajuvent therapy). Patients divided into 2 groups based on the CT scan findings to: CT responder and CT non-responder patients. In the radiation only group, 21 (55 %) patients had raised CEA levels before the treatment, 18 (86%) of them showed a decrease in CEA with CT response, while 3(14%) patients' demonstrated further increase and CT non-response. 17(45%) patients with normal CEA. 15 (89%) of them showed normal CEA post treatment 12 (80%) of them showed CT response and 3 of them shows CT non-response. 2/17 (11%) patients showed further increase in CEA level and CT non-response as well. In the chemoradiotherapy group, 17 (43%) patients had high CEA level before the treatment. 16 (95%) of them showed a decrease in CEA and CT response while 1(5%) patient showed increase in CEA level and CT non-response post treat- ment. 22/39(57%) showed normal CEA where all of them remained in normal level post treatment and only 1 patient (5%) showed CT non-response. All patients with CEA and CT scan response are operable patients and we can consider them for curative resection, while all patients with CEA and CT scan non response are non operable or can get a palliative treatment due to ( metastasis or carcinomatosis). 4 patients of normal CEA post treatment CT scan shows ( increase in thickening and single new lesion in the liver with suspicious of metastasis ) but still operable patients with intension to cure. Conclusions: There is an obvious relation between serum CEA level and CT scan findings during neoadjuvant therapy. CEA level post neoadjuvent therapy can differentiate between operable and non operable patients. CT scan can be used for patients with increase CEA level as further investigation before surgery and can be eliminated for those with CEA normal or dropped level. Further studies are needed to correlate this finding with post operative histopathological finding and patient outcome
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直肠癌新辅助治疗后血清CEA反应与ct扫描结果的关系
血清癌胚抗原(CEA)水平是结直肠癌最广泛使用的肿瘤标志物。据报道,血清CEA升高与复发风险增加和患者预后不良有关。该标志物是否会在直肠癌切除前的术前辅助治疗中发生改变,以及这种改变是否能反映肿瘤的任何变化,目前还没有研究。如果是这样,这可能会指导我们预测姑息性切除的疗效,并将标志物水平与未来肿瘤对辅助治疗的反应联系起来。目的:评价晚期直肠癌患者术前新辅助治疗对血清CEA水平的影响及其与肿瘤CT扫描变化的关系。方法:对2002年1月至2007年10月期间在费萨尔国王专科医院和研究中心接受治疗的所有直肠癌患者的结肠数据库进行回顾性分析。所有患者术前均单独接受长疗程放疗,或联合5-氟尿嘧啶。在开始新辅助治疗前进行血清CEA和CT扫描,手术前再次进行。手术切除计划在治疗完成后6 - 8周。我们根据CT扫描结果确定肿瘤反应的标准,并将结果与新辅助治疗后的CEA水平进行比较。结果:77例患者中,单独放疗38例,放化疗39例,两组患者(新生期治疗前后)均行CT扫描。根据CT扫描结果将患者分为两组:CT应答组和CT无应答组。在单纯放疗组,21例(55%)患者治疗前CEA水平升高,18例(86%)患者CEA水平下降,CT反应,3例(14%)患者CEA水平进一步升高,CT无反应。17例(45%)CEA正常。治疗后CEA正常15例(89%),CT反应12例(80%),CT无反应3例。2/17(11%)患者CEA水平进一步升高,CT无反应。放化疗组17例(43%)患者治疗前CEA水平较高。16例(95%)患者治疗后CEA水平下降,CT反应下降,1例(5%)患者治疗后CEA水平升高,CT无反应。22/39例(57%)CEA正常,治疗后仍维持正常水平,仅有1例(5%)CT无反应。所有CEA和CT扫描反应的患者都是可手术的患者,我们可以考虑对其进行根治性切除,而所有CEA和CT扫描无反应的患者都是不可手术的,或者由于(转移或癌变)可以姑息治疗。4例CEA正常患者治疗后CT扫描显示(增厚增加,肝脏单发新病灶,怀疑有转移)但仍可手术,且有治愈的倾向。结论:新辅助治疗时血清CEA水平与CT表现有明显相关性。新辅助治疗后CEA水平可以区分可手术和不可手术患者。对于CEA升高的患者,CT扫描可作为术前进一步检查,对于CEA正常或下降的患者,可排除。需要进一步的研究将这一发现与术后组织病理学发现和患者预后联系起来
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New trends in rectal cancer treatment Colorectal Cancer Causes and Treatments: A Minireview Association Between Thrombospondin-1, Angiogenesis Related Markers,and Extracellular Matrix Components with Colorectal Cancer Outcome Canadians' Attitudes and Awareness Towards Colorectal Cancer Screen-ing: Results of a National Survey Management of Gastro-intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors with Liver Metastases: A Comprehensive Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1