STALIN AGAINST ENGELS – FOR THE HISTORIOGRAFHY OF THE GREEK PROJECT

Mamuka Natsvaladze
{"title":"STALIN AGAINST ENGELS – FOR THE HISTORIOGRAFHY OF THE GREEK PROJECT","authors":"Mamuka Natsvaladze","doi":"10.36074/logos-29.10.2021.v2.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The article reviews the ideological background, due to which the study of the Russian-Austrian model of European Redistribution in the 60-90-ies of the XVIII century, in particular the Greek Project, was effected by a certain limits of the Soviet period. The Greek Project contained all signs of imperial policy and is recognized as the main concept of Russia's foreign policy. The issues of the foreign policy of the Russian Empire became particularly relevant in 30-ies of XX century, when Engels’s work \"The Foreign Policy of Russian Tsarism\" had to be published in magazine “Bolshevik” at the request of the Bolshevik Adoretsky on the twentieth anniversary of the World War I. However, Stalin had a rather negative reaction to it. Engels's article, revealing Russia's aggressive imperialist intentions, was a pretty good weapon for the world leading countries against Soviet ideology taking into account the complicated foreign policy existing before the Second World War. Stalin's letter - in an open appeal to the Politburo - clearly expressed the criticism towards Engels, the classic of Marxism, and the inexpediency of publishing his work. It was also observed that Soviet ideologues should not allow capitalist ideologues to criticize Russia's foreign policy, whether this criticism referred to Tsarist or Soviet period. Accordingly, the entire Russian foreign policy was revised in accordance with the desired tsarist ideological model. This criticism of Stalin was a signal to Soviet scientists, to refer the problems of Russian foreign policy with a particular consideration, where one of the main topics was the Greek Project. As studies of the Soviet period have shown, Soviet historiography has tried to find a desirable explanation for the Greek Project. Consequently, results of any study of Russia's foreign policy were predetermined and entitled the scientists to make predetermined conclusions as well. Such approach to the issue excluded the possibility of an objective study of the topic from the very beginning. The referred Stalinist methodological principle has not been overcome by current Georgian historiography. It is confirmed by the fact of ignoring the Greek Project and its effect in terms of defining foreign policy.","PeriodicalId":192552,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF TODAY: INTERSECTORAL ISSUES AND DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCES VOLUME2","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF TODAY: INTERSECTORAL ISSUES AND DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCES VOLUME2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-29.10.2021.v2.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. The article reviews the ideological background, due to which the study of the Russian-Austrian model of European Redistribution in the 60-90-ies of the XVIII century, in particular the Greek Project, was effected by a certain limits of the Soviet period. The Greek Project contained all signs of imperial policy and is recognized as the main concept of Russia's foreign policy. The issues of the foreign policy of the Russian Empire became particularly relevant in 30-ies of XX century, when Engels’s work "The Foreign Policy of Russian Tsarism" had to be published in magazine “Bolshevik” at the request of the Bolshevik Adoretsky on the twentieth anniversary of the World War I. However, Stalin had a rather negative reaction to it. Engels's article, revealing Russia's aggressive imperialist intentions, was a pretty good weapon for the world leading countries against Soviet ideology taking into account the complicated foreign policy existing before the Second World War. Stalin's letter - in an open appeal to the Politburo - clearly expressed the criticism towards Engels, the classic of Marxism, and the inexpediency of publishing his work. It was also observed that Soviet ideologues should not allow capitalist ideologues to criticize Russia's foreign policy, whether this criticism referred to Tsarist or Soviet period. Accordingly, the entire Russian foreign policy was revised in accordance with the desired tsarist ideological model. This criticism of Stalin was a signal to Soviet scientists, to refer the problems of Russian foreign policy with a particular consideration, where one of the main topics was the Greek Project. As studies of the Soviet period have shown, Soviet historiography has tried to find a desirable explanation for the Greek Project. Consequently, results of any study of Russia's foreign policy were predetermined and entitled the scientists to make predetermined conclusions as well. Such approach to the issue excluded the possibility of an objective study of the topic from the very beginning. The referred Stalinist methodological principle has not been overcome by current Georgian historiography. It is confirmed by the fact of ignoring the Greek Project and its effect in terms of defining foreign policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯大林对恩格斯——为了希腊计划的史学
. 文章回顾了18世纪60-90年代俄罗斯-奥地利欧洲再分配模式的研究,特别是希腊计划,受到苏联时期一定限制的思想背景。希腊计划包含了帝国政策的所有迹象,被认为是俄罗斯外交政策的主要概念。20世纪30年代,在第一次世界大战结束20周年之际,应布尔什维克党人阿多列茨基的要求,恩格斯的著作《俄国沙皇的外交政策》不得不在《布尔什维克》杂志上发表,俄罗斯帝国的外交政策问题变得尤为重要。然而,斯大林对此的反应却相当消极。恩格斯的文章揭示了俄国侵略的帝国主义意图,考虑到二战前存在的复杂外交政策,恩格斯的文章是世界主要国家反对苏联意识形态的一个很好的武器。斯大林在写给政治局的公开信中,明确表达了对马克思主义经典恩格斯的批评,以及发表恩格斯著作的不恰当之处。人们还注意到,苏联的理论家不应该允许资本主义理论家批评俄罗斯的外交政策,无论这种批评是指沙皇时期还是苏联时期。因此,整个俄罗斯的外交政策都按照理想的沙皇意识形态模式进行了修改。这种对斯大林的批评是对苏联科学家的一个信号,让他们在考虑俄罗斯外交政策的问题时要特别考虑,其中一个主要话题就是希腊计划。正如对苏联时期的研究所表明的那样,苏联史学试图为希腊计划找到一个令人满意的解释。因此,对俄罗斯外交政策的任何研究结果都是预先确定的,科学家也有权作出预先确定的结论。这种处理问题的方法从一开始就排除了对该专题进行客观研究的可能性。所提到的斯大林主义方法论原则并没有被当前的格鲁吉亚史学所克服。忽视希腊计划及其在确定外交政策方面的影响这一事实证实了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EVALUATION OF THE SHAPE OF THE ABDOMEN IN CHILDREN DURING THE CORRECTION OF THE PATHOLOGY OF THE VAGINAL PROCESS OF THE PERITONEUM BILINGUAL EDUCATION AS A MEANS OF PERSONALITY FORMATION IN A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY ФОРМУВАННЯ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТЕЙ ТА ЦІННОСТЕЙ ВИПУСКНИКА НОВОЇ УКРАЇНСЬКОЇ ШКОЛИ ОСОБЛИВОСТІ КОНСТРУЮВАННЯ ДІТЕЙ ДОШКІЛЬНОГО ВІКУ ІНФОРМАЦІЙНА КОМПЕТЕНТНІСТЬ ЯК УМОВА ПРОФЕСІЙНОЇ ЕФЕКТИВНОСТІ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ СОЦІАЛЬНОГО ПЕДАГОГА У СПЕЦІАЛЬНІЙ ШКОЛІ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1