«Memory Wars»: between Metaphor and Concept

O. Golovashina
{"title":"«Memory Wars»: between Metaphor and Concept","authors":"O. Golovashina","doi":"10.15826/tetm.2021.1.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the semantic field of \"memory wars\", identification of prerequisites and models of conceptualization of this concept, substantiation of the possibility of using the metaphor \"memorial wars\" as a concept. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research involves reference to the works of M. Foucault, R. Kozellek, M. Halbwachs, as well as to cognitive theories of metaphors (D. Lakoff, M. Johnson, A. P. Chudinov). Analysis of existing models for studying the history of concepts, analysis of specific social and discursive factors allowed us to trace the conceptualization of \"memory wars\" and to state the appearance of the corresponding scientific category, but additional theoretical work is needed to distinguish related concepts, as well as a clearer distinction between the metaphor \"memory wars\" and the corresponding scientific category.","PeriodicalId":269039,"journal":{"name":"Tempus et Memoria","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tempus et Memoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/tetm.2021.1.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the semantic field of "memory wars", identification of prerequisites and models of conceptualization of this concept, substantiation of the possibility of using the metaphor "memorial wars" as a concept. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research involves reference to the works of M. Foucault, R. Kozellek, M. Halbwachs, as well as to cognitive theories of metaphors (D. Lakoff, M. Johnson, A. P. Chudinov). Analysis of existing models for studying the history of concepts, analysis of specific social and discursive factors allowed us to trace the conceptualization of "memory wars" and to state the appearance of the corresponding scientific category, but additional theoretical work is needed to distinguish related concepts, as well as a clearer distinction between the metaphor "memory wars" and the corresponding scientific category.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
«记忆战争»:隐喻与概念之间
本文研究了“记忆战争”的语义场,确定了“记忆战争”概念化的前提和模式,论证了“记忆战争”隐喻作为概念的可能性。该研究的理论和方法基础包括参考M.福柯、R. Kozellek、M. Halbwachs的著作,以及隐喻的认知理论(D. Lakoff、M. Johnson、A. P. Chudinov)。分析现有的概念史研究模型,分析具体的社会和话语因素,使我们能够追溯“记忆战争”的概念化,并陈述相应的科学范畴的出现,但需要额外的理论工作来区分相关的概念,以及更清晰地区分隐喻“记忆战争”和相应的科学范畴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Visual Images of the 1990s in Instagram: A Commercialization of Nostalgia Domestic and Regional History in the Mirror of the Cultural Memory of Kaliningrad Residents: Generational Differences Memory and Identity on the Borderland: Reinterpretation of Space Ethnonational Stories: Socio-Political Foundations and Economics of Construction (Based on the Materials of the Republic of Tatarstan) Politics of Memory in Russia in 1990s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1