A comparative study of SPI Approaches with ProPAM

Paula Ventura Martins, A. Silva
{"title":"A comparative study of SPI Approaches with ProPAM","authors":"Paula Ventura Martins, A. Silva","doi":"10.1109/QUATIC.2007.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software process improvement (SPI) is one of the main software development challenges. Unfortunately, process descriptions generally do not correspond to the processes actually performed during software development projects. They just represent high-level plans and do not contain the information necessary for the concrete software projects. This deficient alignment between the process and project is caused by processes that are unrelated to project activities and failure in detecting project changes to improve the process. Process and project alignment is essential to really find out how process management is important to achieve an organization's strategic objectives. Considering this approach, this paper presents a comparative study of some of the most recognized SPI approaches and a new software process improvement methodology proposed, designed by Process and Project Alignment Methodology (ProPAM). Our intention is to show the problems observed in existing SPI approach and recognize that further research in process and project alignment based on actor oriented approaches is required.","PeriodicalId":236466,"journal":{"name":"6th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC 2007)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"6th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QUATIC.2007.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Software process improvement (SPI) is one of the main software development challenges. Unfortunately, process descriptions generally do not correspond to the processes actually performed during software development projects. They just represent high-level plans and do not contain the information necessary for the concrete software projects. This deficient alignment between the process and project is caused by processes that are unrelated to project activities and failure in detecting project changes to improve the process. Process and project alignment is essential to really find out how process management is important to achieve an organization's strategic objectives. Considering this approach, this paper presents a comparative study of some of the most recognized SPI approaches and a new software process improvement methodology proposed, designed by Process and Project Alignment Methodology (ProPAM). Our intention is to show the problems observed in existing SPI approach and recognize that further research in process and project alignment based on actor oriented approaches is required.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SPI方法与ProPAM的比较研究
软件过程改进(SPI)是软件开发的主要挑战之一。不幸的是,过程描述通常与软件开发项目中实际执行的过程不一致。它们只是表示高级计划,并不包含具体软件项目所需的信息。过程和项目之间缺乏一致性是由与项目活动无关的过程和检测项目变更以改进过程的失败造成的。过程和项目的一致性对于真正发现过程管理对于实现组织的战略目标是多么重要是必不可少的。考虑到这种方法,本文提出了一些最公认的SPI方法和一种新的软件过程改进方法的比较研究,该方法由过程和项目对齐方法(proam)设计。我们的目的是展示在现有SPI方法中观察到的问题,并认识到需要进一步研究基于面向参与者的方法的过程和项目一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Nationwide Program for Software Process Improvement in Brazil Automatic Generation of User Interfaces from Domain and Use Case Models A Practical Model for Measuring Maintainability Problems and Pitfalls in a CMMI level 3 to level 4 Migration Process A Scalable Quality of Service Middleware System with Passive Monitoring Agents over Wireless Video Transmission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1