Logical consensuses for case-based reasoning and for mathematical engineering of AI

É. Grégoire, Jean-Marie Lagniez, Du Zhang
{"title":"Logical consensuses for case-based reasoning and for mathematical engineering of AI","authors":"É. Grégoire, Jean-Marie Lagniez, Du Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICCI-CC.2016.7862041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We claim that computing forms of consensus among several agents about their solutions to past problems can play a useful pre-treatment role in case-based reasoning. Intuitively, we define a consensus as a subset of the plain accumulation of all the agents' individual past discovered solutions such that every agent can agree on all the information in this subset. A consensus can be expected to form a more reliable basis for further re-use or generalization than the knowledge from which it is extracted. We define various forms of logical consensus in this context: the focus is on computational issues about the automated extraction of consensuses in an extended Boolean logic setting.","PeriodicalId":135701,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 15th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI*CC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 15th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI*CC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCI-CC.2016.7862041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We claim that computing forms of consensus among several agents about their solutions to past problems can play a useful pre-treatment role in case-based reasoning. Intuitively, we define a consensus as a subset of the plain accumulation of all the agents' individual past discovered solutions such that every agent can agree on all the information in this subset. A consensus can be expected to form a more reliable basis for further re-use or generalization than the knowledge from which it is extracted. We define various forms of logical consensus in this context: the focus is on computational issues about the automated extraction of consensuses in an extended Boolean logic setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于案例推理和人工智能数学工程的逻辑共识
我们声称,计算几个智能体对过去问题的解决方案的共识形式可以在基于案例的推理中发挥有用的预处理作用。直观地,我们将共识定义为所有智能体个体过去发现的解决方案的简单积累的子集,这样每个智能体都可以就该子集中的所有信息达成一致。可以期望共识形成一个更可靠的基础,以便进一步重用或推广,而不是从中提取的知识。在这种情况下,我们定义了各种形式的逻辑共识:重点是关于在扩展布尔逻辑设置中自动提取共识的计算问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Autonomous robot controller using bitwise gibbs sampling Learnings and innovations in speech recognition Qualitative analysis of pre-performance routines in throwing using simple brain-wave sensor Improving pattern classification by nonlinearly combined classifiers Feature extraction of video using deep neural network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1