ADAPTACIÓN Y VALIDACIÓN DEL CUESTIONARIO DE SUPERVISIÓN ABUSIVA DE TEPPER (SAT) EN EMPLEADOS DE LA REGIÓN DE ARICA Y PARINACOTA

Patricio Mena-Chamorro, Rodrigo Ferrer-Urbina, Francisca Parra, María José Leon Ron, J. Vásquez
{"title":"ADAPTACIÓN Y VALIDACIÓN DEL CUESTIONARIO DE SUPERVISIÓN ABUSIVA DE TEPPER (SAT) EN EMPLEADOS DE LA REGIÓN DE ARICA Y PARINACOTA","authors":"Patricio Mena-Chamorro, Rodrigo Ferrer-Urbina, Francisca Parra, María José Leon Ron, J. Vásquez","doi":"10.4067/s0718-50652021000100207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to adapt and obtain evidence of validity of the Tepper Abusive Supervision questionnaire (TAS) for use in adult workers in Arica, Chile. An instrumental cross-sectional design was used, with a sample of 287 participants from private companies in the city. Reliability estimates were performed by means of McDonald’s omega hierarchical coefficient and Cronbach’s alpha and validity evidence was obtained based on the internal structure of the test, by means of confirmatory factor analysis. The results showed that the debugged dichotomous version provides adequate comparative and absolute fit indicators (RMSEA = .04; CFI = .99; TLI = .98), with adequate levels of reliability ( α = .87; ω = .88). It is concluded that the TepperAbusive Supervision questionnaire (TAS) shows adequate psychometric properties for the measurement of abusive supervision in equivalent samples of working adults.","PeriodicalId":111465,"journal":{"name":"Límite (Arica)","volume":"52 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Límite (Arica)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50652021000100207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to adapt and obtain evidence of validity of the Tepper Abusive Supervision questionnaire (TAS) for use in adult workers in Arica, Chile. An instrumental cross-sectional design was used, with a sample of 287 participants from private companies in the city. Reliability estimates were performed by means of McDonald’s omega hierarchical coefficient and Cronbach’s alpha and validity evidence was obtained based on the internal structure of the test, by means of confirmatory factor analysis. The results showed that the debugged dichotomous version provides adequate comparative and absolute fit indicators (RMSEA = .04; CFI = .99; TLI = .98), with adequate levels of reliability ( α = .87; ω = .88). It is concluded that the TepperAbusive Supervision questionnaire (TAS) shows adequate psychometric properties for the measurement of abusive supervision in equivalent samples of working adults.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对阿里卡和帕里纳科塔地区员工的泰珀滥用监督问卷(SAT)进行调整和验证
本研究的目的是改编并获得泰珀虐待监督问卷(TAS)的有效性证据,用于智利阿利卡的成年工人。采用工具横断面设计,样本为287名来自该市私营公司的参与者。采用McDonald’s omega等级系数和Cronbach’s alpha进行信度估计,采用验证性因子分析根据检验的内部结构获得效度证据。结果表明,经过调试的二分类版本提供了足够的比较和绝对拟合指标(RMSEA = .04;Cfi = 0.99;TLI = .98),具有足够的信度水平(α = .87;ω = .88)。结果表明,泰珀虐待监督问卷(TAS)具有足够的心理测量特性,可用于测量同等样本的工作成年人的虐待监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enseñando a pensar críticamente mediante la analogía Da Grécia antiga à clínica moderna: Uma análise das influências estoicas nas terapias cognitivas de Ellis e de Beck Estudio fenomenológico experimental de la empatía por dolor en adulto mayor sano Hacia una política de la memoria. Perspectivas de Walter Benjamin y Georges Didi-Huberman en torno a la imagen La afinidad ontológico/veritativa entre poesía y filosofía
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1