Advanced human factors Process Failure Modes and Effects analysis

Mei Rong, Ting Zhao, Yang Yu
{"title":"Advanced human factors Process Failure Modes and Effects analysis","authors":"Mei Rong, Ting Zhao, Yang Yu","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2008.4925823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Process Failure Mode and Effects analysis (PFMEA) is a technique to identify, analyze and evaluate the potential failure modes of a production process. The purpose is to suggest control measures to reduce the risk of the production process effectively. NASA has used the PFMEA technique to analyze human processes or tasks. This type of analysis can be referred to as a \"human factors process FMEA, HF-FMEA\". HF-FMEA breaks down a task process into discrete steps so the actions associated with a process step can be specifically analyzed for potential failure. For each action performed, all potential human errors are identified. Each error is then evaluated to identify positive and negative contributing factors, barriers, and controls. The aim of these works is to give risk reduction measures to minimize the risk of human process. Although HF-PFMEA has achieved significant achievements in the analysis of human factors, the technique itself is still to be improved. For example, the technique has no generic method to decompose the task, and it is difficult to identify human operational errors comprehensively. This paper proposes some solutions to the shortcomings of the conventional approach. Advanced HF-PFMEA integrates several important concepts that distinguish it from conventional HF-FMEA, including: (1) suggest a method to break down task process according to the sequence and logicality of task process, (2) use hazard and operability study (HAZOP) to analyze human operational errors. The operational errors can be identified by determining guidewords and process parameters.","PeriodicalId":143940,"journal":{"name":"2008 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2008.4925823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Process Failure Mode and Effects analysis (PFMEA) is a technique to identify, analyze and evaluate the potential failure modes of a production process. The purpose is to suggest control measures to reduce the risk of the production process effectively. NASA has used the PFMEA technique to analyze human processes or tasks. This type of analysis can be referred to as a "human factors process FMEA, HF-FMEA". HF-FMEA breaks down a task process into discrete steps so the actions associated with a process step can be specifically analyzed for potential failure. For each action performed, all potential human errors are identified. Each error is then evaluated to identify positive and negative contributing factors, barriers, and controls. The aim of these works is to give risk reduction measures to minimize the risk of human process. Although HF-PFMEA has achieved significant achievements in the analysis of human factors, the technique itself is still to be improved. For example, the technique has no generic method to decompose the task, and it is difficult to identify human operational errors comprehensively. This paper proposes some solutions to the shortcomings of the conventional approach. Advanced HF-PFMEA integrates several important concepts that distinguish it from conventional HF-FMEA, including: (1) suggest a method to break down task process according to the sequence and logicality of task process, (2) use hazard and operability study (HAZOP) to analyze human operational errors. The operational errors can be identified by determining guidewords and process parameters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先进的人为因素,过程失效模式和影响分析
过程失效模式和影响分析(PFMEA)是一种识别、分析和评价生产过程潜在失效模式的技术。目的是提出有效降低生产过程风险的控制措施。NASA已经使用PFMEA技术来分析人类的过程或任务。这种类型的分析可以称为“人为因素过程FMEA, HF-FMEA”。HF-FMEA将任务过程分解为离散的步骤,因此与过程步骤相关的动作可以专门分析潜在的故障。对于执行的每个操作,将识别所有潜在的人为错误。然后对每个错误进行评估,以确定积极和消极的促成因素、障碍和控制。这些工作的目的是提供降低风险的措施,以尽量减少人为过程的风险。虽然HF-PFMEA在人因分析方面取得了显著的成果,但技术本身仍有待改进。例如,该技术没有通用的方法来分解任务,并且难以全面识别人为操作错误。针对传统方法的不足,本文提出了一些解决方案。先进的HF-PFMEA集成了与传统的HF-FMEA不同的几个重要概念,包括:(1)根据任务过程的顺序和逻辑性提出一种分解任务过程的方法;(2)使用危害和可操作性研究(HAZOP)来分析人为操作错误。操作误差可以通过确定指导词和工艺参数来识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What's wrong with bent pin analysis, and what to do about it A systems reliability approach to decision making in autonomous multi-platform systems operating a phased mission Software tools for PRA Optimal highway maintenance policies under uncertainty Reliability analysis of phased-mission systems using Bayesian networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1