Making no-arbitrage discounting-invariant: a new FTAP beyond NFLVR and NUPBR

D. Bálint, M. Schweizer
{"title":"Making no-arbitrage discounting-invariant: a new FTAP beyond NFLVR and NUPBR","authors":"D. Bálint, M. Schweizer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3676499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In general multi-asset models of financial markets, the classic no-arbitrage concepts NFLVR and NUPBR have a serious shortcoming — they depend crucially on the way prices are discounted. To avoid this unnatural economic behaviour, we introduce a new idea for defining “absence of arbitrage”. It rests on the new notion of strongly index weight maximal strategies, which allows us to generalise both NFLVR (by dynamic index weight efficiency) and NUPBR (by dynamic index weight viability). These new no-arbitrage concepts do not change when we look at discounted or undiscounted prices, and they can be used in open-ended models under very weak assumptions on asset prices. We establish corresponding versions of the FTAP, i.e., dual characterisations of our concepts in terms of martingale properties. A key new feature is that as one expects, “properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly”, but with an endogenous discounting process which is not a priori chosen exogenously. We also illustrate our results by a wide range of examples. In particular, we show that the classic Black–Scholes model on [0,1) is arbitrage-free in our sense if and only if its parameters satisfy m−r e {0, σ²} or, equivalently, either bond-discounted or stock-discounted prices are martingales.","PeriodicalId":269529,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3676499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In general multi-asset models of financial markets, the classic no-arbitrage concepts NFLVR and NUPBR have a serious shortcoming — they depend crucially on the way prices are discounted. To avoid this unnatural economic behaviour, we introduce a new idea for defining “absence of arbitrage”. It rests on the new notion of strongly index weight maximal strategies, which allows us to generalise both NFLVR (by dynamic index weight efficiency) and NUPBR (by dynamic index weight viability). These new no-arbitrage concepts do not change when we look at discounted or undiscounted prices, and they can be used in open-ended models under very weak assumptions on asset prices. We establish corresponding versions of the FTAP, i.e., dual characterisations of our concepts in terms of martingale properties. A key new feature is that as one expects, “properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly”, but with an endogenous discounting process which is not a priori chosen exogenously. We also illustrate our results by a wide range of examples. In particular, we show that the classic Black–Scholes model on [0,1) is arbitrage-free in our sense if and only if its parameters satisfy m−r e {0, σ²} or, equivalently, either bond-discounted or stock-discounted prices are martingales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使无套利贴现不变:超越NFLVR和NUPBR的新FTAP
在金融市场的一般多资产模型中,经典的无套利概念NFLVR和NUPBR有一个严重的缺点——它们严重依赖于价格的贴现方式。为了避免这种不自然的经济行为,我们引入了一个定义“无套利”的新概念。它依赖于强指标权重最大化策略的新概念,这使我们能够推广NFLVR(通过动态指标权重效率)和NUPBR(通过动态指标权重可行性)。当我们观察贴现或未贴现价格时,这些新的无套利概念不会改变,它们可以在对资产价格非常弱的假设下用于开放式模型。我们建立了FTAP的相应版本,即我们的概念在鞅性质方面的双重特征。一个关键的新特征是,正如人们所预期的那样,“适当预期的价格随机波动”,但具有内生的贴现过程,而不是先天选择的外生过程。我们还通过广泛的例子来说明我们的结果。特别地,我们证明了[0,1)上的经典Black-Scholes模型在我们的意义上是无套利的,当且仅当它的参数满足m - re {0, σ²},或者,等价地,债券折现价格或股票折现价格是鞅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
All-to-All Liquidity in Corporate Bonds Does Dispersed Sentiment Drive Returns, Turnover, and Volatility for Bitcoin? Hedonic Models and Market Segmentation Picking Partners: Manager Selection in Private Equity A Theory of Debt Accumulation and Deficit Cycles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1