Effects of Implicit and Explicit Focus on Form on L2 Acquisition of the English Passive: An Analysis of Intra-Learner Variation

Ji-Yung Jung
{"title":"Effects of Implicit and Explicit Focus on Form on L2 Acquisition of the English Passive: An Analysis of Intra-Learner Variation","authors":"Ji-Yung Jung","doi":"10.15334/FLE.2021.28.1.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated intra-learner variation in the effects of implicit and explicit focus on form (FonF) on second language (L2) acquisition of the English passive, an interface construction. The study employed a pretest-posttest-delayed posttest design, with five treatment sessions between the pretest and posttests. Implicit FonF was operationalized as textual enhancement (TE), and explicit FonF as consciousness-raising (C-R). Five different outcome measures were utilized to examine the respective treatment effects on the form, meaning, and function of the passive. Data were collected with four Korean high school students, two engaging in TE and the other two in C-R, whose developmental routes through the experiment were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The results of the analysis showed that implicit and explicit FonF led to differential variation within each learner, not only across the outcome measures but also over time, yet were suggestive of a potential benefits to each for the different domains encompassed in the passive. These results are further discussed in relation to the learners’ proficiency levels and the types of errors they produced.","PeriodicalId":414404,"journal":{"name":"Foreign Languages Education","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foreign Languages Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15334/FLE.2021.28.1.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated intra-learner variation in the effects of implicit and explicit focus on form (FonF) on second language (L2) acquisition of the English passive, an interface construction. The study employed a pretest-posttest-delayed posttest design, with five treatment sessions between the pretest and posttests. Implicit FonF was operationalized as textual enhancement (TE), and explicit FonF as consciousness-raising (C-R). Five different outcome measures were utilized to examine the respective treatment effects on the form, meaning, and function of the passive. Data were collected with four Korean high school students, two engaging in TE and the other two in C-R, whose developmental routes through the experiment were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The results of the analysis showed that implicit and explicit FonF led to differential variation within each learner, not only across the outcome measures but also over time, yet were suggestive of a potential benefits to each for the different domains encompassed in the passive. These results are further discussed in relation to the learners’ proficiency levels and the types of errors they produced.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内隐和外显形式关注对英语被动语习得的影响:学习者内部差异分析
本研究探讨了内隐和外显形式关注(FonF)对第二语言被动语(一种界面结构)习得影响的学习者内部差异。该研究采用了前测后测延迟后测设计,在前测和后测之间有五个治疗阶段。内隐式字体记忆被操作为文本增强(TE),外显式字体记忆被操作为意识提升(C-R)。使用五种不同的结果测量来检查各自的治疗对被动语态的形式、意义和功能的影响。收集了4名韩国高中生的数据,其中2名从事TE,另外2名从事C-R,通过实验对他们的发展路线进行了定量和定性分析。分析结果表明,内隐和外显FonF导致每个学习者内部的差异变化,不仅在结果测量中,而且随着时间的推移,但暗示了被动中包含的不同领域对每个人都有潜在的好处。这些结果进一步讨论了与学习者的熟练程度和他们产生的错误类型的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Korean EFL Learner Preference for Voice-Based Audio Asynchronous Online Discussion Investigating factors behind errors in English spelling: Through interviews with students An analysis of the relationship between pre-service teachers’ regulatory focus orientations and oral English proficiency A comparative study of the Chinese prepositional ‘给’ and the Korean case-auxiliary suffix ‘에게’ Comparison between the original Indonesian spelling system (EBI) and the fifth edition of the enhanced spelling of the Indonesian language (EYD V): Focusing on the use of character and punctuation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1