Learning-based evaluation of visual analytic systems

Remco Chang, Caroline Ziemkiewicz, Roman Pyzh, Joseph Kielman, W. Ribarsky
{"title":"Learning-based evaluation of visual analytic systems","authors":"Remco Chang, Caroline Ziemkiewicz, Roman Pyzh, Joseph Kielman, W. Ribarsky","doi":"10.1145/2110192.2110197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluation in visualization remains a difficult problem because of the unique constraints and opportunities inherent to visualization use. While many potentially useful methodologies have been proposed, there remain significant gaps in assessing the value of the open-ended exploration and complex task-solving that the visualization community holds up as an ideal. In this paper, we propose a methodology to quantitatively evaluate a visual analytics (VA) system based on measuring what is learned by its users as the users reapply the knowledge to a different problem or domain. The motivation for this methodology is based on the observation that the ultimate goal of a user of a VA system is to gain knowledge of and expertise with the dataset, task, or tool itself. We propose a framework for describing and measuring knowledge gain in the analytical process based on these three types of knowledge and discuss considerations for evaluating each. We propose that through careful design of tests that examine how well participants can reapply knowledge learned from using a VA system, the utility of the visualization can be more directly assessed.","PeriodicalId":235801,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2110192.2110197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Evaluation in visualization remains a difficult problem because of the unique constraints and opportunities inherent to visualization use. While many potentially useful methodologies have been proposed, there remain significant gaps in assessing the value of the open-ended exploration and complex task-solving that the visualization community holds up as an ideal. In this paper, we propose a methodology to quantitatively evaluate a visual analytics (VA) system based on measuring what is learned by its users as the users reapply the knowledge to a different problem or domain. The motivation for this methodology is based on the observation that the ultimate goal of a user of a VA system is to gain knowledge of and expertise with the dataset, task, or tool itself. We propose a framework for describing and measuring knowledge gain in the analytical process based on these three types of knowledge and discuss considerations for evaluating each. We propose that through careful design of tests that examine how well participants can reapply knowledge learned from using a VA system, the utility of the visualization can be more directly assessed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于学习的视觉分析系统评价
由于可视化使用的独特限制和固有机会,可视化评估仍然是一个难题。虽然已经提出了许多潜在有用的方法,但在评估开放式探索和复杂任务解决的价值方面仍然存在重大差距,可视化社区认为这是一种理想的方法。在本文中,我们提出了一种定量评估视觉分析(VA)系统的方法,该方法基于测量用户在将知识重新应用于不同问题或领域时所学到的知识。采用这种方法的动机是基于以下观察:VA系统用户的最终目标是获得数据集、任务或工具本身的知识和专业知识。基于这三种类型的知识,我们提出了一个描述和测量分析过程中知识获取的框架,并讨论了评估每种知识的考虑因素。我们建议,通过仔细设计测试,检查参与者如何很好地重新应用从使用虚拟现实系统中学到的知识,可以更直接地评估可视化的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lowering the Barrier for Successful Replication and Evaluation A Nested Workflow Model for Visual Analytics Design and Validation Cognitive Stages in Visual Data Exploration Evaluating Information Visualization on Mobile Devices: Gaps and Challenges in the Empirical Evaluation Design Space Action Design Research and Visualization Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1