[Therapy of carcinoma-in-situ: comparison of methods].

G Bresciani, V Bianco, A Migliarini
{"title":"[Therapy of carcinoma-in-situ: comparison of methods].","authors":"G Bresciani,&nbsp;V Bianco,&nbsp;A Migliarini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This work comparatively evaluates the results of therapy for CIN (in terms of recovery persistence and relapse) in 362 women submitted to electrocauterization, laser vaporization, laser conization, diathermy loop conization, cold knife conization, from January 1980 to December 1989. Parameters as age, CIN grade, time elapsed between diagnosis and therapy, contraceptive exposition, have been considered. The results show a slight difference in the persistence and relapse rates between conization globally considered (traditional, laser, loop) and local surgery (cauterization, laser) in favour of the latter. Nevertheless the difference was too little to suggest abandoning one treatment in favour of the others. Moreover this work indicates that the results of therapy are independent from the type of contraceptive used. Furthermore, the finding of relapses during follow up only in CIN grade 2 indicates that this grade of CIN must be considered at risk, requesting adequate consideration and follow up.</p>","PeriodicalId":75513,"journal":{"name":"Annali di ostetricia, ginecologia, medicina perinatale","volume":"111 4","pages":"228-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali di ostetricia, ginecologia, medicina perinatale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work comparatively evaluates the results of therapy for CIN (in terms of recovery persistence and relapse) in 362 women submitted to electrocauterization, laser vaporization, laser conization, diathermy loop conization, cold knife conization, from January 1980 to December 1989. Parameters as age, CIN grade, time elapsed between diagnosis and therapy, contraceptive exposition, have been considered. The results show a slight difference in the persistence and relapse rates between conization globally considered (traditional, laser, loop) and local surgery (cauterization, laser) in favour of the latter. Nevertheless the difference was too little to suggest abandoning one treatment in favour of the others. Moreover this work indicates that the results of therapy are independent from the type of contraceptive used. Furthermore, the finding of relapses during follow up only in CIN grade 2 indicates that this grade of CIN must be considered at risk, requesting adequate consideration and follow up.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤原位治疗:方法比较。
本文比较评价了1980年1月至1989年12月362例妇女接受电烧灼、激光汽化、激光锥切、透热环锥切、冷刀锥切治疗CIN的疗效(从恢复、持续和复发方面)。考虑了年龄、CIN分级、诊断和治疗之间的时间间隔、避孕药暴露等参数。结果显示,全球锥化(传统,激光,环)和局部手术(烧灼,激光)之间的持久性和复发率略有不同,有利于后者。然而,这种差异太小,不足以让人放弃一种治疗方法而选择另一种。此外,这项工作表明,治疗的结果是独立于类型的避孕使用。此外,随访期间仅发现CIN 2级复发,表明必须考虑该级CIN有危险,需要充分考虑和随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Flare-up study and gonadotropin extinction curve in patients treated with long-acting triptorelin, 3.75 mg im]. [Ovulation induction using pulsatile GnRH in patients with hypothalamic amenorrhea: effects of changing the frequency and dosage on the luteal phase]. [Critical evaluation of P-C test parameters in screening pelvic musculature activity]. [Indications, surgical modality and complications of hysterectomy for benign pathology: results of a Lombard study. Gruppo di Studio Lombardo sull'Isterectomia]. [Infusion pre-hydration and a humid room in the prevention of postoperative adhesions].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1