PAKISTAN-INDIA CONFLICT AND THE RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION OF KASHMIR

Y. Gunawan, D. Putri, Ravenska Marchdiva Sienda, Sigit Rosidi, Ami Cintia Melinda
{"title":"PAKISTAN-INDIA CONFLICT AND THE RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION OF KASHMIR","authors":"Y. Gunawan, D. Putri, Ravenska Marchdiva Sienda, Sigit Rosidi, Ami Cintia Melinda","doi":"10.14710/DILREV.6.1.2021.139-156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dispute in Jammu and Kashmir has been tensed by the revocation of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution by the Indian government in the end of 2019. The existence of Kashmir has become one of matters as the main focus between India-Pakistan conflicts. People are under diverse senses of de facto and de jure martial law. Estimated from 1990, thereabouts 70,000 people have been killed, 8,000 people have been subjected to enforced disappearances, thousand of them also victims of repressive laws and Indian security forces humiliate the protestors and detainees frequently. The research is normative legal research by using statute approach and case approach through literature review. The research aims to discuss and analyze the implementation of the rights of self-determination pursuant to Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan. The results of the study indicate all the disputes should be ended by giving the right to self-determination, which should be given to the people of Kashmir, thus the disputes between the two countries can be resolved properly and making a clarity of Kashmir status.","PeriodicalId":432511,"journal":{"name":"Diponegoro Law Review","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diponegoro Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/DILREV.6.1.2021.139-156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dispute in Jammu and Kashmir has been tensed by the revocation of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution by the Indian government in the end of 2019. The existence of Kashmir has become one of matters as the main focus between India-Pakistan conflicts. People are under diverse senses of de facto and de jure martial law. Estimated from 1990, thereabouts 70,000 people have been killed, 8,000 people have been subjected to enforced disappearances, thousand of them also victims of repressive laws and Indian security forces humiliate the protestors and detainees frequently. The research is normative legal research by using statute approach and case approach through literature review. The research aims to discuss and analyze the implementation of the rights of self-determination pursuant to Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan. The results of the study indicate all the disputes should be ended by giving the right to self-determination, which should be given to the people of Kashmir, thus the disputes between the two countries can be resolved properly and making a clarity of Kashmir status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴印冲突和克什米尔的自决权
由于印度政府于2019年底撤销了印度宪法第370条,查谟和克什米尔的争端变得紧张。克什米尔的存在已成为印巴冲突的主要焦点之一。人们处于不同意义上的事实上和法律上的戒严令之下。据估计,自1990年以来,大约有7万人被杀害,8 000人被迫失踪,其中数千人也是压迫性法律的受害者,印度安全部队经常羞辱抗议者和被拘留者。通过文献综述,运用成文法方法和案例方法进行规范性法律研究。本研究旨在探讨和分析根据印巴克什米尔争端自决权利的实施情况。研究结果表明,应通过给予克什米尔人民自决权来结束所有争端,从而妥善解决两国之间的争端,并明确克什米尔的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE EXISTENCE OF PANCASILA IN RESOLVING CONFLICTS OF DIFFERING VIEWS ON RELIGIOUS RIGHTS IN INDONESIA LEGAL POLICY ON ECO-PARTNERSHIPS TO ACHIEVE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT EXISTENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP IN INDONESIA LEGAL ANALYSIS OF CRYPTO INVESTMENT IN ERA 4.0 VIEW FROM CREDO THEORY REGIONAL AUTONOMY IN THE POLITICAL SYSTEM AND AUTHORITY IN INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1