Comparative study: the effects of latex and vinyl gloves on the tactile discrimination of first year dental hygiene students.

Clinical preventive dentistry Pub Date : 1990-06-01
A L Brunick, S Burns, K Gross, M Tishk, P Feil
{"title":"Comparative study: the effects of latex and vinyl gloves on the tactile discrimination of first year dental hygiene students.","authors":"A L Brunick,&nbsp;S Burns,&nbsp;K Gross,&nbsp;M Tishk,&nbsp;P Feil","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purposes of this study were to determine 1) if there was a significant difference in the tactile discrimination of first year dental hygiene students wearing a vinyl glove as compared to a latex glove; 2) if the subjects' perceptions of their ability to accurately discriminate between surface textures differed when wearing either one of the two gloves; and 3) the individual characteristics of the gloves preferred by the subjects. Twenty-nine first year dental students were randomly assigned to one of the two glove treatment groups. The tactile discrimination ability of each subject was assessed at baseline and three weeks after using the Roughness Discrimination Test (RDT). The subjects wore their assigned gloves when performing laboratory and clinical procedures during the 3-week period. Following this period the RDT was again administered. Subjects then switched gloves for an additional 3-week period, at which time data were collected regarding perceived discrimination ability and glove preference. Data were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results revealed no significant difference (p less than 0.05) in subject's tactile discrimination ability while 29% indicated that the latex glove had an inhibitory effect. The subjects most frequently preferred the latex glove, citing specific favorable characteristics such as size, fit, comfort and durability while performing clinical procedures. However, the vinyl glove was favored for durability after washing.</p>","PeriodicalId":75715,"journal":{"name":"Clinical preventive dentistry","volume":"12 2","pages":"21-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine 1) if there was a significant difference in the tactile discrimination of first year dental hygiene students wearing a vinyl glove as compared to a latex glove; 2) if the subjects' perceptions of their ability to accurately discriminate between surface textures differed when wearing either one of the two gloves; and 3) the individual characteristics of the gloves preferred by the subjects. Twenty-nine first year dental students were randomly assigned to one of the two glove treatment groups. The tactile discrimination ability of each subject was assessed at baseline and three weeks after using the Roughness Discrimination Test (RDT). The subjects wore their assigned gloves when performing laboratory and clinical procedures during the 3-week period. Following this period the RDT was again administered. Subjects then switched gloves for an additional 3-week period, at which time data were collected regarding perceived discrimination ability and glove preference. Data were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results revealed no significant difference (p less than 0.05) in subject's tactile discrimination ability while 29% indicated that the latex glove had an inhibitory effect. The subjects most frequently preferred the latex glove, citing specific favorable characteristics such as size, fit, comfort and durability while performing clinical procedures. However, the vinyl glove was favored for durability after washing.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对比研究:乳胶手套与乙烯基手套对口腔卫生一年级学生触觉辨别的影响。
本研究的目的是确定1)戴乙烯基手套与戴乳胶手套的一年级口腔卫生学生的触觉辨别是否有显著差异;2)佩戴两种手套时,受试者对其准确区分表面纹理的能力的感知是否不同;3)受试者偏好手套的个体特征。29名牙科一年级学生被随机分配到两个手套治疗组中的一个。采用粗糙辨别测验(RDT),分别在基线和三周后对受试者的触觉辨别能力进行评估。在为期三周的时间里,受试者在进行实验室和临床操作时戴上指定的手套。在此之后,再次进行RDT。然后,受试者在另外3周的时间内更换手套,在此期间收集有关感知辨别能力和手套偏好的数据。数据分析采用重复测量方差分析。结果显示,被试的触觉辨别能力差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05), 29%的被试认为乳胶手套有抑制作用。受试者通常更喜欢乳胶手套,在进行临床手术时,他们引用了诸如尺寸、合身、舒适和耐用等特定的有利特征。然而,乙烯基手套在洗涤后的耐用性更受青睐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variability of two methods of measuring absorbed dose in dental radiography. Indirect pulp capping: a survey. In vitro demineralization inhibition of enamel caries utilizing an unfilled resin. Enhancing flossing compliance in college freshmen. Clinical effect of a triclosan-containing dentifrice on plaque and gingivitis: a six-month study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1