Image reconstruction from incomplete measurements: Maximum Entropy versus L1 norm optimization

M. Petrovici, C. Damian, D. Coltuc
{"title":"Image reconstruction from incomplete measurements: Maximum Entropy versus L1 norm optimization","authors":"M. Petrovici, C. Damian, D. Coltuc","doi":"10.1109/ISSCS.2017.8034886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) and Compressive Sensing (CS) are two paradigms that allow good image reconstruction from a low number of measurements. MaxEnt is based on the maximization of entropy while CS uses the minimization of l1 norm of image sparse representation. In this paper, MaxEnt and CS are tested in conditions simulating the acquisition by Single Pixel Camera. The set of measurements is obtained by non-uniform sampling (NUS) of the image. Before sampling, the images are blurred with a Gaussian kernel in order to simulate the camera Point Spread Function (PSF). The results show that both CS and MaxEnt reconstruct above the quality of blurred image and that, generally, CS performs better than MaxEnt. The impact of sparsity and camera PSF are discussed. The sparsity has higher influence in CS than in MaxEnt while for the PSF, it is the opposite: CS does not seem to be sensitive to the PSF size. The number of measured samples is also discussed. For more than 50% measured pixels, MaxEnt improves only a few the image quality while CS increases constantly the image PSNR.","PeriodicalId":338255,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems (ISSCS)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems (ISSCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSCS.2017.8034886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) and Compressive Sensing (CS) are two paradigms that allow good image reconstruction from a low number of measurements. MaxEnt is based on the maximization of entropy while CS uses the minimization of l1 norm of image sparse representation. In this paper, MaxEnt and CS are tested in conditions simulating the acquisition by Single Pixel Camera. The set of measurements is obtained by non-uniform sampling (NUS) of the image. Before sampling, the images are blurred with a Gaussian kernel in order to simulate the camera Point Spread Function (PSF). The results show that both CS and MaxEnt reconstruct above the quality of blurred image and that, generally, CS performs better than MaxEnt. The impact of sparsity and camera PSF are discussed. The sparsity has higher influence in CS than in MaxEnt while for the PSF, it is the opposite: CS does not seem to be sensitive to the PSF size. The number of measured samples is also discussed. For more than 50% measured pixels, MaxEnt improves only a few the image quality while CS increases constantly the image PSNR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不完全测量的图像重建:最大熵与L1范数优化
最大熵(MaxEnt)和压缩感知(CS)是允许从少量测量中进行良好图像重建的两种范例。MaxEnt基于熵的最大化,而CS使用图像稀疏表示的l1范数的最小化。本文在模拟单像素相机采集的条件下,对MaxEnt和CS进行了测试。该测量集是通过图像的非均匀采样(NUS)获得的。在采样前,对图像进行高斯核模糊处理,模拟相机点扩散函数(PSF)。结果表明,CS和MaxEnt重构的图像质量都高于模糊图像的质量,总体上CS优于MaxEnt。讨论了稀疏度和相机PSF的影响。稀疏度在CS中的影响比在MaxEnt中更大,而对于PSF,则相反:CS似乎对PSF的大小不敏感。还讨论了测量样品的数量。对于超过50%的测量像素,MaxEnt仅提高了少量图像质量,而CS则不断提高图像的PSNR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extended DES algorithm to Galois Fields Internet of Things and LoRa™ Low-Power Wide-Area Networks: A survey An adaptive solution for nonlinear system identification DMHT-LEACH: Dynamic multi-hop technique for wireless sensor networks Hybrid image interpolation technique based on nonlinear second and fourth-order diffusions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1