A Novel Mittag-Leffler Function Decline Model for Production Forecasting in Multi-Layered Unconventional Oil Reservoirs

Yuewei Pan, Guoxin Li, Wei Ma, W. J. Lee, Yulong Yang
{"title":"A Novel Mittag-Leffler Function Decline Model for Production Forecasting in Multi-Layered Unconventional Oil Reservoirs","authors":"Yuewei Pan, Guoxin Li, Wei Ma, W. J. Lee, Yulong Yang","doi":"10.2118/210335-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Over the past several decades, Arps decline curve analysis (DCA) has proved to be effective and efficient for production forecasts and EUR estimates due to its simplicity and applicability. However, as multi-stage hydraulically-fractured horizontal wells have unlocked the economic potential of unconventional reservoirs, forecasting future production accurately using Arps decline models becomes more challenging because of the complicated fluid flow mechanisms characterizing stimulated multi-layered ultra-low permeability porous media. Many field studies indicate unreliable forecasts and limitations in multi-layered field applications in particular. This paper presents a Mittag-Leffler (ML) function decline model which enhances the reliability of forecasts for multi-layered unconventional oil reservoirs by honoring anomalous diffusion physics for each layer.\n Many traditional decline curve models fail to honor the sub- or super-diffusion phenomenon under the paradigm of anomalous diffusion. The general form of our proposed two-factor ML function consolidates anomalous diffusion and classical diffusion into a single model, specifically including Arps hyperbolic, harmonic, exponential decline models and the stretched exponential decline model (SEPD) as special cases. Comparisons show that the ML model falls between the predictions of Arps and SEPD models in which the estimates are consistently either \"overly optimistic\" or \"too conservative.\" For a multi-fractured horizontal well, the fracture height partially penetrating different layers leads to a layer-wise flow pattern which is reflected and captured in the production profile by curve-fitting the corresponding ML function parameters. We provide a workflow to guarantee consistency when applying the approach to each layer in field cases. We applied the workflow to one synthetic case using embedded discrete fracture modeling (EDFM) and to two field cases. We used hindcasting to demonstrate efficacy of the model by matching early-to-middle time production histories, forecasting future production, and comparing forecasted performance to hidden histories as well as to the corresponding EURs. The comparisons demonstrate the validity and reliability of the proposed ML function decline curve model for multi-layered unconventional oil reservoirs.\n Overall, this study shows that the novel ML-function DCA model is a robust alternative to forecast production and EUR in multi-layered unconventional oil reservoirs. The workflow presented was validated using one synthetic case and two actual field cases. This method further provides unique insight into multi-fractured horizontal well production profile characterization and facilitates well-spacing optimization, thereby improving reservoir development in layered unconventional reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":113697,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","volume":"112 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210335-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past several decades, Arps decline curve analysis (DCA) has proved to be effective and efficient for production forecasts and EUR estimates due to its simplicity and applicability. However, as multi-stage hydraulically-fractured horizontal wells have unlocked the economic potential of unconventional reservoirs, forecasting future production accurately using Arps decline models becomes more challenging because of the complicated fluid flow mechanisms characterizing stimulated multi-layered ultra-low permeability porous media. Many field studies indicate unreliable forecasts and limitations in multi-layered field applications in particular. This paper presents a Mittag-Leffler (ML) function decline model which enhances the reliability of forecasts for multi-layered unconventional oil reservoirs by honoring anomalous diffusion physics for each layer. Many traditional decline curve models fail to honor the sub- or super-diffusion phenomenon under the paradigm of anomalous diffusion. The general form of our proposed two-factor ML function consolidates anomalous diffusion and classical diffusion into a single model, specifically including Arps hyperbolic, harmonic, exponential decline models and the stretched exponential decline model (SEPD) as special cases. Comparisons show that the ML model falls between the predictions of Arps and SEPD models in which the estimates are consistently either "overly optimistic" or "too conservative." For a multi-fractured horizontal well, the fracture height partially penetrating different layers leads to a layer-wise flow pattern which is reflected and captured in the production profile by curve-fitting the corresponding ML function parameters. We provide a workflow to guarantee consistency when applying the approach to each layer in field cases. We applied the workflow to one synthetic case using embedded discrete fracture modeling (EDFM) and to two field cases. We used hindcasting to demonstrate efficacy of the model by matching early-to-middle time production histories, forecasting future production, and comparing forecasted performance to hidden histories as well as to the corresponding EURs. The comparisons demonstrate the validity and reliability of the proposed ML function decline curve model for multi-layered unconventional oil reservoirs. Overall, this study shows that the novel ML-function DCA model is a robust alternative to forecast production and EUR in multi-layered unconventional oil reservoirs. The workflow presented was validated using one synthetic case and two actual field cases. This method further provides unique insight into multi-fractured horizontal well production profile characterization and facilitates well-spacing optimization, thereby improving reservoir development in layered unconventional reservoirs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多层非常规油藏产量预测的Mittag-Leffler函数递减模型
在过去的几十年里,Arps下降曲线分析(DCA)由于其简单和适用性,已被证明是有效和高效的产量预测和EUR估计。然而,随着多级水力压裂水平井释放了非常规油藏的经济潜力,由于多层超低渗透多孔介质的流体流动机制复杂,使用Arps递减模型准确预测未来产量变得更具挑战性。许多现场研究表明,预测不可靠,特别是在多层现场应用中存在局限性。本文提出了一种Mittag-Leffler (ML)函数递减模型,该模型考虑了各层的异常扩散物理特性,提高了多层非常规油藏预测的可靠性。许多传统的衰减曲线模型未能考虑异常扩散范式下的亚扩散或超扩散现象。我们提出的双因子ML函数的一般形式将反常扩散和经典扩散合并为一个模型,特别是包括Arps双曲,调和,指数下降模型和拉伸指数下降模型(SEPD)作为特殊情况。比较表明,ML模型的预测结果介于Arps和SEPD模型之间,两者的预测结果要么“过于乐观”,要么“过于保守”。对于多缝水平井,裂缝高度部分穿透不同层,形成分层流动模式,通过曲线拟合相应的ML函数参数,将其反映并捕捉到生产剖面中。我们提供了一个工作流程,以确保在现场情况下将该方法应用于每个层时的一致性。我们将工作流程应用于一个使用嵌入式离散裂缝建模(EDFM)的综合案例和两个现场案例。通过匹配早期到中期的生产历史,预测未来的生产,并将预测的性能与隐藏的历史以及相应的EURs进行比较,我们使用后播来证明模型的有效性。通过对比,验证了所建立的多层非常规油藏ML函数递减曲线模型的有效性和可靠性。总的来说,该研究表明,新的ml函数DCA模型是多层非常规油藏产量和EUR预测的可靠替代方案。通过一个合成案例和两个实际现场案例对所提出的工作流进行了验证。该方法进一步提供了对多裂缝水平井生产剖面特征的独特见解,有助于优化井距,从而改善层状非常规油藏的油藏开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Yardsticks for the End of Economic Life: Holdback and Its Adjuncts Gas Transport Modeling in Organic-Rich Shales with Nonequilibrium Sorption Kinetics Team Coaching in Oil and Gas Fluid-Pipe Interaction in Horizontal Gas-Liquid Flow A Robust Workflow for Optimizing Drilling/Completion/Frac Design Using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1