Knowledge, attitude, and practice of physicians regarding pain management in patients with Sickle cell disease

Abdellatif Ismail, Ali Aqel, Ma’in Abumuhfouz, Mohamad Safieh, M. Arabyat, M. Ibrahim, Kalpana Singh, M. Yassin
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and practice of physicians regarding pain management in patients with Sickle cell disease","authors":"Abdellatif Ismail, Ali Aqel, Ma’in Abumuhfouz, Mohamad Safieh, M. Arabyat, M. Ibrahim, Kalpana Singh, M. Yassin","doi":"10.3389/frhem.2023.1214902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hemoglobin disorder inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern. Pain from vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) is the most common symptom experienced by patients with SCD; thus, pain management constitutes a significant role in this patient population. We hypothesized that physicians with less favorable attitudes toward SCD patients are less likely to follow pain management guidelines. In this cross-sectional convenience sample survey, we aimed to assess the adherence of physicians in our institute to guidelines for the management of SCD pain crises and study the factors that are associated with non-adherence to these guidelines. Most surveyed physicians were early in their career and were found to adhere to the recommendations of using opioids and NSAIDs as a first-line therapy and avoiding using meperidine. On the other hand, some analgesic practices deviated from the recommendations, including less frequent assessment and reassessment of pain and response to pain medications and less frequent use of opioid patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). It is noteworthy that the frequency and severity of untreated pain in patients with SCD are associated with higher mortality, thus appropriate comprehensive care for such a vulnerable population should be prioritized and optimized. Although we did not find an association between the providers’ attitudes toward SCD patients and their pain management practices, improving these attitudes will promote the provider–patient relationship and its therapeutic outcomes. We conclude that the physicians taking care of SCD patients in our institute adhere to some of the guidelines in the field more than others. We also conclude that they have negative attitudes toward SCD patients; nevertheless, these did not affect their pain management practices.","PeriodicalId":101407,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhem.2023.1214902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hemoglobin disorder inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern. Pain from vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) is the most common symptom experienced by patients with SCD; thus, pain management constitutes a significant role in this patient population. We hypothesized that physicians with less favorable attitudes toward SCD patients are less likely to follow pain management guidelines. In this cross-sectional convenience sample survey, we aimed to assess the adherence of physicians in our institute to guidelines for the management of SCD pain crises and study the factors that are associated with non-adherence to these guidelines. Most surveyed physicians were early in their career and were found to adhere to the recommendations of using opioids and NSAIDs as a first-line therapy and avoiding using meperidine. On the other hand, some analgesic practices deviated from the recommendations, including less frequent assessment and reassessment of pain and response to pain medications and less frequent use of opioid patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). It is noteworthy that the frequency and severity of untreated pain in patients with SCD are associated with higher mortality, thus appropriate comprehensive care for such a vulnerable population should be prioritized and optimized. Although we did not find an association between the providers’ attitudes toward SCD patients and their pain management practices, improving these attitudes will promote the provider–patient relationship and its therapeutic outcomes. We conclude that the physicians taking care of SCD patients in our institute adhere to some of the guidelines in the field more than others. We also conclude that they have negative attitudes toward SCD patients; nevertheless, these did not affect their pain management practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
镰状细胞病患者疼痛管理的医生的知识、态度和实践
镰状细胞病是一种常染色体隐性遗传的血红蛋白疾病。血管闭塞危机(VOCs)引起的疼痛是SCD患者最常见的症状;因此,疼痛管理在这一患者群体中扮演着重要的角色。我们假设,对SCD患者态度较差的医生不太可能遵循疼痛管理指南。在这个横断面抽样调查中,我们的目的是评估我院医生对SCD疼痛危机管理指南的依从性,并研究与不遵守这些指南相关的因素。大多数接受调查的医生都处于职业生涯的早期,并且坚持使用阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药作为一线治疗,避免使用哌啶。另一方面,一些镇痛实践偏离了建议,包括较少频繁地评估和重新评估疼痛和对止痛药的反应,较少使用阿片类药物患者控制镇痛(PCA)。值得注意的是,SCD患者未经治疗的疼痛频率和严重程度与较高的死亡率相关,因此应优先考虑并优化对这一弱势群体的适当综合护理。虽然我们没有发现提供者对SCD患者的态度与其疼痛管理实践之间的关联,但改善这些态度将促进提供者与患者的关系及其治疗效果。我们得出的结论是,在我们研究所照顾SCD患者的医生比其他医生更遵守该领域的一些指导方针。我们还得出结论,他们对SCD患者持消极态度;然而,这些并没有影响他们的疼痛管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of biosimilar pegfilgrastim in patients with lymphoma after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation: a real-life study Targeting the bone marrow niche, moving towards leukemia eradication First clinical experience of isatuximab safety and tolerability in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: real-world data from a compassionate use program in Germany Morphological, clinical, and molecular profiling of post-polycythemia vera accelerated/blast phase occurring with and without antecedent secondary myelofibrosis Evaluating the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in adults with sickle cell disease during the Omicron period of COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1