The challenge of understanding the flow of sentiments in social media documents

SMUC '11 Pub Date : 2011-10-28 DOI:10.1145/2065023.2065025
D. Losada
{"title":"The challenge of understanding the flow of sentiments in social media documents","authors":"D. Losada","doi":"10.1145/2065023.2065025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This talk is focused on a key task in the area of Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis: polarity classification of social media documents (e.g. blog posts). Estimating polarity is much more demanding than estimating topicality. As a matter of fact, the effectiveness of polarity classification is still modest and does not compare with the effectiveness of standard retrieval tasks. Polarity estimation is severely affected by parts of the text that are off-topic or that simply do not express any opinion. In fact, the key sentiments in a document often appear in specific locations of the text. Furthermore, there are usually conflicting opinions in a given document and this mixed set of opinions harms the performance of automatic methods designed to estimate the overall orientation of the text.\n In this talk, I will argue that understanding the flow of sentiments in a text is a major challenge for effectively predicting the document's orientation towards a given topic. I will briefly outline some possible avenues to address this challenging issue and review some recent papers that take steps in this direction.","PeriodicalId":341071,"journal":{"name":"SMUC '11","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SMUC '11","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2065023.2065025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This talk is focused on a key task in the area of Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis: polarity classification of social media documents (e.g. blog posts). Estimating polarity is much more demanding than estimating topicality. As a matter of fact, the effectiveness of polarity classification is still modest and does not compare with the effectiveness of standard retrieval tasks. Polarity estimation is severely affected by parts of the text that are off-topic or that simply do not express any opinion. In fact, the key sentiments in a document often appear in specific locations of the text. Furthermore, there are usually conflicting opinions in a given document and this mixed set of opinions harms the performance of automatic methods designed to estimate the overall orientation of the text. In this talk, I will argue that understanding the flow of sentiments in a text is a major challenge for effectively predicting the document's orientation towards a given topic. I will briefly outline some possible avenues to address this challenging issue and review some recent papers that take steps in this direction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解社交媒体文档中情绪流动的挑战
这次演讲的重点是意见挖掘和情感分析领域的一个关键任务:社交媒体文档(如博客文章)的极性分类。估计极性比估计局部性要困难得多。事实上,极性分类的有效性仍然是适度的,不能与标准检索任务的有效性相比。极性估计严重影响的部分文本,离题或根本没有表达任何意见。事实上,文档中的关键情感通常出现在文本的特定位置。此外,在给定的文档中通常存在相互冲突的意见,这种混合的意见集损害了用于估计文本总体方向的自动方法的性能。在这次演讲中,我将论证理解文本中的情感流是有效预测文档对给定主题的方向的主要挑战。我将简要概述一些可能的途径来解决这个具有挑战性的问题,并回顾一些最近在这个方向上采取步骤的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improved answer ranking in social question-answering portals On the generation of rich content metadata from social media Characterizing Wikipedia pages using edit network motif profiles Detection of near-duplicate user generated contents: the SMS spam collection ThemeCrowds: multiresolution summaries of twitter usage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1