Turmoil Amid Reform

Robert F. Zeidel
{"title":"Turmoil Amid Reform","authors":"Robert F. Zeidel","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501748318.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter assesses how Woodrow Wilson's candidacy, along with that of Theodore Roosevelt and Eugene Debs, signaled the height of the Progressive Era, a time beginning in the early 1900s when Americans believed that sufficient application of proper ways and means could alleviate virtually any social or economic malady. Progressives held contrasting ideas about how best to address immigrant-related issues, especially the extent to which their continued influx would exacerbate a host of problems. Some, like Wilson, saw immigrants as valuable additions to the United States, and emphasized the need to assimilate them properly so that they would come to embody “American” values and practices. Others believed that immigrants contributed disproportionately to social ills, a propensity that justified their exclusion. To these restrictionists, the imposition of more effective ways to reduce the number of immigrants and improve the quality of those allowed in would contribute to national rectification. Businesses in need of immigrant laborers sought ways to allay the restrictionists' fears, but new labor conflicts involving foreign-born women and men complicated their efforts. Two years after the 1912 election, the outbreak of war in Europe exacerbated domestic concerns about the loyalty of foreign-born residents, further complicating America's “immigration problem.”","PeriodicalId":269093,"journal":{"name":"Robber Barons and Wretched Refuse","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Robber Barons and Wretched Refuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501748318.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter assesses how Woodrow Wilson's candidacy, along with that of Theodore Roosevelt and Eugene Debs, signaled the height of the Progressive Era, a time beginning in the early 1900s when Americans believed that sufficient application of proper ways and means could alleviate virtually any social or economic malady. Progressives held contrasting ideas about how best to address immigrant-related issues, especially the extent to which their continued influx would exacerbate a host of problems. Some, like Wilson, saw immigrants as valuable additions to the United States, and emphasized the need to assimilate them properly so that they would come to embody “American” values and practices. Others believed that immigrants contributed disproportionately to social ills, a propensity that justified their exclusion. To these restrictionists, the imposition of more effective ways to reduce the number of immigrants and improve the quality of those allowed in would contribute to national rectification. Businesses in need of immigrant laborers sought ways to allay the restrictionists' fears, but new labor conflicts involving foreign-born women and men complicated their efforts. Two years after the 1912 election, the outbreak of war in Europe exacerbated domestic concerns about the loyalty of foreign-born residents, further complicating America's “immigration problem.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改革中的动荡
本章评估伍德罗·威尔逊的参选,以及西奥多·罗斯福和尤金·德布斯的参选,是如何标志着进步时代的高峰。进步时代始于20世纪初,当时美国人相信,充分运用适当的方法和手段,几乎可以缓解任何社会或经济弊病。对于如何最好地解决与移民有关的问题,特别是他们的持续涌入会在多大程度上加剧一系列问题,进步派持有截然不同的观点。有些人,如威尔逊,视移民为美国的宝贵补充,并强调有必要适当地同化他们,使他们能够体现“美国”的价值观和做法。另一些人则认为,移民对社会弊病的贡献不成比例,这种倾向证明了排斥他们的合理性。对这些限制主义者来说,采取更有效的方法减少移民数量,提高移民的质量,将有助于全国整顿。需要移民劳工的企业想方设法减轻限制主义者的担忧,但涉及外国出生的男女的新劳资冲突使他们的努力复杂化了。1912年大选两年后,欧洲爆发的战争加剧了国内对外国出生居民忠诚度的担忧,使美国的“移民问题”进一步复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Into the New Century Acknowledgments 3. Alien Anarchism: Immigrants and Industrial Unrest in the 1880s Frontmatter Frontmatter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1