Comparison of NASA Almond Radar Cross Section Simulation Results from Shoot-Bouncing-Ray Method and Multi-Level-Fast-Multipole-Method

S. M. Chung, S. Tuan
{"title":"Comparison of NASA Almond Radar Cross Section Simulation Results from Shoot-Bouncing-Ray Method and Multi-Level-Fast-Multipole-Method","authors":"S. M. Chung, S. Tuan","doi":"10.1109/iWEM49354.2020.9237433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NASA almond CAD model is a standard for radar cross section (RCS) evaluation. In this article we compare the RCS simulation results from Shoot-Bouncing-Ray (SBR) method and Multi-Level-Fast-Multipole-Method (MLFMM). We found under default solver in these two commercial codes, the RCS results show considerable difference in S band where it matters most in terms of RF stealth.","PeriodicalId":201518,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Workshop on Electromagnetics: Applications and Student Innovation Competition (iWEM)","volume":"7 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Workshop on Electromagnetics: Applications and Student Innovation Competition (iWEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iWEM49354.2020.9237433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

NASA almond CAD model is a standard for radar cross section (RCS) evaluation. In this article we compare the RCS simulation results from Shoot-Bouncing-Ray (SBR) method and Multi-Level-Fast-Multipole-Method (MLFMM). We found under default solver in these two commercial codes, the RCS results show considerable difference in S band where it matters most in terms of RF stealth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弹跳射线法与多级快速多极法NASA杏仁雷达截面模拟结果比较
NASA杏仁CAD模型是雷达截面(RCS)评估的标准。本文比较了弹跳射线法(SBR)和多层快速多极法(MLFMM)的RCS模拟结果。我们发现,在这两个商业代码的默认解算器下,RCS结果在S波段显示出相当大的差异,这在射频隐身方面最重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Beam-steerable Holographic Antenna Time domain Near-Field Measurement Technology and Simulation for System Level ESD Testing Automatic Target Recognition in SAR Images Based on a Combination of CNN and SVM Millimeter-Wave Leaky-Wave Antenna for 5G Mobile Phone Coplanar Antenna Design for GNSS and WiFi Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1