Software Testing Using Test Sheets

C. Atkinson, Florian Barth, D. Brenner
{"title":"Software Testing Using Test Sheets","authors":"C. Atkinson, Florian Barth, D. Brenner","doi":"10.1109/ICSTW.2010.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although testing is one of the most important activities in software development, especially in projects which emphasize agile development, the basic approach used to define and report tests has changed little since JUnit was introduced over a decade ago. JUnit and its derivatives such as NUnit significantly simplify the task of programming tests but still leave the test logic tangled up with program scaffolding, making it difficult to see and validate. On the other hand, recently introduced validation oriented approaches, such as FIT, provide a much more concise and easy to understand description of test logic, but cannot cope with code-level testing. In this paper we present a new metaphor for test definition and reporting, referred to as \"test sheets\", that combines the expressive strength of JUnit with the visual simplicity of tabular approaches such as FIT. After discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the technologies used today we present the test sheet approach using some simple examples.","PeriodicalId":117410,"journal":{"name":"2010 Third International Conference on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation Workshops","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Third International Conference on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW.2010.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Although testing is one of the most important activities in software development, especially in projects which emphasize agile development, the basic approach used to define and report tests has changed little since JUnit was introduced over a decade ago. JUnit and its derivatives such as NUnit significantly simplify the task of programming tests but still leave the test logic tangled up with program scaffolding, making it difficult to see and validate. On the other hand, recently introduced validation oriented approaches, such as FIT, provide a much more concise and easy to understand description of test logic, but cannot cope with code-level testing. In this paper we present a new metaphor for test definition and reporting, referred to as "test sheets", that combines the expressive strength of JUnit with the visual simplicity of tabular approaches such as FIT. After discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the technologies used today we present the test sheet approach using some simple examples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用测试表进行软件测试
尽管测试是软件开发中最重要的活动之一,特别是在强调敏捷开发的项目中,但是自JUnit在十多年前被引入以来,用于定义和报告测试的基本方法几乎没有改变。JUnit及其衍生产品(如NUnit)极大地简化了编程测试的任务,但仍然使测试逻辑与程序脚手架纠缠在一起,使其难以查看和验证。另一方面,最近引入的面向验证的方法,如FIT,提供了更简洁和易于理解的测试逻辑描述,但不能处理代码级测试。在本文中,我们提出了一个新的测试定义和报告的比喻,称为“测试表”,它结合了JUnit的表现力和表格方法(如FIT)的视觉简单性。在讨论了目前使用的技术的优缺点之后,我们用一些简单的例子来展示测试表方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overcoming Obstacles to Test-Driven Learning on Day One Large-Scale Software Testing Environment Using Cloud Computing Technology for Dependable Parallel and Distributed Systems Rich Internet Application Testing Using Execution Trace Data Effort Comparison for Model-Based Testing Scenarios Generating Minimal Fault Detecting Test Suites for Boolean Expressions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1