Metadrama and the Murderous Nature of Authority

B. Angus
{"title":"Metadrama and the Murderous Nature of Authority","authors":"B. Angus","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474432917.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since early modern debate about the legitimacy of theatre concerns the question of the author’s authority in relation to that of the licensing authorities, and their informers, the fear of misinterpretation generates a self-conscious metadrama which expresses the ambiguity of authority in dramatic structures that aim to manipulate audiences’ responses. But, moreover, this metadrama often also acknowledges theatre’s own potential for complicity in social control, and is often concerned with the interchangeability of authority figures, informers and author-actors. In Philip Massinger’s The Roman Actor, these tensions and interconnections are embodied in the metadramatic representations of the dramatic productions in the tyrannous court of Domitian Caesar which conflate the act of acting with the murderous nature of authority and finally reflect on the nascent and often theatrical court of Charles I itself.","PeriodicalId":149383,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence and Metadrama in the Early Modern Theatre","volume":"314 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence and Metadrama in the Early Modern Theatre","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474432917.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since early modern debate about the legitimacy of theatre concerns the question of the author’s authority in relation to that of the licensing authorities, and their informers, the fear of misinterpretation generates a self-conscious metadrama which expresses the ambiguity of authority in dramatic structures that aim to manipulate audiences’ responses. But, moreover, this metadrama often also acknowledges theatre’s own potential for complicity in social control, and is often concerned with the interchangeability of authority figures, informers and author-actors. In Philip Massinger’s The Roman Actor, these tensions and interconnections are embodied in the metadramatic representations of the dramatic productions in the tyrannous court of Domitian Caesar which conflate the act of acting with the murderous nature of authority and finally reflect on the nascent and often theatrical court of Charles I itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元戏剧与权威的凶残本质
由于关于戏剧合法性的早期现代辩论涉及作者与许可当局及其告密者的权威关系的问题,因此对误解的恐惧产生了一种自我意识的元戏剧,它表达了旨在操纵观众反应的戏剧结构中权威的模糊性。但是,此外,这种元戏剧也经常承认戏剧本身在社会控制方面的共谋潜力,并且经常关注权威人物、告密者和作者演员的互换性。在菲利普·马辛格的《罗马演员》中,这些紧张关系和相互联系体现在多米提安·凯撒的暴虐宫廷的戏剧作品的元戏剧表现中,它将表演行为与权威的凶残本质混为一谈,并最终反映了查理一世的新生和戏剧宫廷本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Errant Intelligence –The Devil’s Own The Burning Issue: Metadrama and Contested Authority in Chettle’s Hoffman The Parasites of Machiavel The Knight of the Burning Pestle and the Menace of the Audience Conclusion: No One Is There–Ubiquity and Invisibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1