Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs)

Jonathan P. Tennant, Natalia Z. Bielczyk, B. G. Tzovaras, Paola Masuzzo, T. Steiner
{"title":"Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs)","authors":"Jonathan P. Tennant, Natalia Z. Bielczyk, B. G. Tzovaras, Paola Masuzzo, T. Steiner","doi":"10.5334/kula.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An enormous wealth of digital tools now exists for collaborating on scholarly research projects. In particular, it is now possible to collaboratively author research articles in an openly participatory and dynamic format. Here we describe and provide recommendations for a more open process of digital collaboration, and discuss the potential issues and pitfalls that come with managing large and diverse authoring communities. We summarize our personal experiences in a form of ‘ten simple recommendations’. Typically, these collaborative, online projects lead to the production of what we here introduce as Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). We consider a MOOP to be distinct from a ‘traditional’ collaborative article in that it is defined by an openly participatory process, not bound within the constraints of a predefined contributors list. This is a method of organised creativity designed for the efficient generation and capture of ideas in order to produce new knowledge. Given the diversity of potential authors and projects that can be brought into this process, we do not expect that these tips will address every possible project. Rather, these tips are based on our own experiences and will be useful when different groups and communities can uptake different elements into their own workflows. We believe that creating inclusive, interdisciplinary, and dynamic environments is ultimately good for science, providing a way to exchange knowledge and ideas as a community. We hope that these Recommendations will prove useful for others who might wish to explore this space.","PeriodicalId":425221,"journal":{"name":"KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

An enormous wealth of digital tools now exists for collaborating on scholarly research projects. In particular, it is now possible to collaboratively author research articles in an openly participatory and dynamic format. Here we describe and provide recommendations for a more open process of digital collaboration, and discuss the potential issues and pitfalls that come with managing large and diverse authoring communities. We summarize our personal experiences in a form of ‘ten simple recommendations’. Typically, these collaborative, online projects lead to the production of what we here introduce as Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). We consider a MOOP to be distinct from a ‘traditional’ collaborative article in that it is defined by an openly participatory process, not bound within the constraints of a predefined contributors list. This is a method of organised creativity designed for the efficient generation and capture of ideas in order to produce new knowledge. Given the diversity of potential authors and projects that can be brought into this process, we do not expect that these tips will address every possible project. Rather, these tips are based on our own experiences and will be useful when different groups and communities can uptake different elements into their own workflows. We believe that creating inclusive, interdisciplinary, and dynamic environments is ultimately good for science, providing a way to exchange knowledge and ideas as a community. We hope that these Recommendations will prove useful for others who might wish to explore this space.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大规模开放在线论文(MOOPs)
现在有大量的数字工具用于学术研究项目的合作。特别是,现在有可能以公开参与和动态的形式合作撰写研究文章。在这里,我们描述并提供了更开放的数字协作过程的建议,并讨论了管理大型和多样化的创作社区所带来的潜在问题和陷阱。我们以“十条简单建议”的形式总结了我们的个人经验。通常,这些协作的在线项目会导致我们在这里介绍的大规模开放在线论文(MOOPs)的产生。我们认为MOOP不同于“传统的”协作文章,因为它是由一个公开参与的过程定义的,而不是受预定义贡献者列表的约束。这是一种组织创造力的方法,旨在有效地产生和捕获想法,以产生新知识。考虑到这个过程中可能包含的潜在作者和项目的多样性,我们并不期望这些技巧能够处理所有可能的项目。更确切地说,这些技巧是基于我们自己的经验,当不同的团体和社区可以将不同的元素吸收到他们自己的工作流中时,这些技巧将是有用的。我们相信,创造包容的、跨学科的、动态的环境最终对科学是有益的,它为作为一个社区交流知识和思想提供了一种途径。我们希望这些建议将对其他可能希望探索这一领域的人有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LIS Journals’ Lack of Participation in Wikidata Item Creation Using Linked Data Sources to Enhance Catalog Discovery Leveraging Wikidata to Build Scholarly Profiles as Service Re-purposing Excavation Database Content as Paradata South Asian Canadian Digital Archive Thesaurus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1