EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A CLOSED CIRCUIT IN COMPARISON WITH AN OPEN CIRCUIT OF CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

Berik Tuishiev, Gulzhan Bayzhan, Sabina Samitova
{"title":"EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A CLOSED CIRCUIT IN COMPARISON WITH AN OPEN CIRCUIT OF CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS","authors":"Berik Tuishiev, Gulzhan Bayzhan, Sabina Samitova","doi":"10.35805/bsk2021iii044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of closed-loop surgeries with the planned duration of cardiopulmonary bypass more than 2 hours in the immediate postoperative period. \nMaterials and methods. A study was carried out in the clinic over 10 patients (average age 47-56 years) with Diagnoses: Ascending aortic aneurysm, FC 3 aortic valve insufficiency, who underwent surgery for ascending aorta replacement, aortic valve replacement with coronary artery reimplantation. The patients were divided into 2 groups, the 1st group (5 patients) is the control group using an open cardiopulmonary bypass circuit, the 2nd group (5 patients) is the patients using a closed cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. The total time of cardiopulmonary bypass in both groups was 125-187 minutes. \nResults. In the 2nd study group, drainage blood loss significantly decreased, on average 60-100 ml compared to the control group, where the average drainage loss was 600-1500 ml. The need for blood transfusion was 5.1% in the 2nd group, compared with 43.4% in the control group. In the study group 2, the number of platelets in the postoperative period in patients was higher than in the control group. \nConclusion. This study shows that a closed circuit, compared to an open one, allows complex heart surgeries with a planned duration of extracorporeal circulation of more than 2-3 hours.","PeriodicalId":197118,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35805/bsk2021iii044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of closed-loop surgeries with the planned duration of cardiopulmonary bypass more than 2 hours in the immediate postoperative period. Materials and methods. A study was carried out in the clinic over 10 patients (average age 47-56 years) with Diagnoses: Ascending aortic aneurysm, FC 3 aortic valve insufficiency, who underwent surgery for ascending aorta replacement, aortic valve replacement with coronary artery reimplantation. The patients were divided into 2 groups, the 1st group (5 patients) is the control group using an open cardiopulmonary bypass circuit, the 2nd group (5 patients) is the patients using a closed cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. The total time of cardiopulmonary bypass in both groups was 125-187 minutes. Results. In the 2nd study group, drainage blood loss significantly decreased, on average 60-100 ml compared to the control group, where the average drainage loss was 600-1500 ml. The need for blood transfusion was 5.1% in the 2nd group, compared with 43.4% in the control group. In the study group 2, the number of platelets in the postoperative period in patients was higher than in the control group. Conclusion. This study shows that a closed circuit, compared to an open one, allows complex heart surgeries with a planned duration of extracorporeal circulation of more than 2-3 hours.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外循环闭式与开式的有效性比较
目的评价术后即刻计划体外循环时间大于2小时的闭环手术的效果。材料和方法。对10例诊断为升主动脉瘤、FC 3型主动脉瓣功能不全,行升主动脉置换术、主动脉瓣置换术合并冠状动脉再造术的患者(平均年龄47 ~ 56岁)进行临床研究。将患者分为两组,第一组(5例)为采用开放式体外循环的对照组,第二组(5例)为采用封闭式体外循环的患者。两组体外循环总时间125 ~ 187 min。结果。在第二个研究组中,引流失血量明显减少,平均为60-100 ml,而对照组的平均引流失血量为600-1500 ml。第二组需要输血的比例为5.1%,而对照组为43.4%。研究2组患者术后血小板数量高于对照组。结论。这项研究表明,与开放电路相比,封闭电路允许复杂的心脏手术,计划体外循环持续时间超过2-3小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THORACOSCOPY VERSUS STERNOTOMY IN THE CORRECTION OF A VENTRICULAR SEPTAL DEFECT: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FROM THE SURGICAL DEPARTMENT OF A MULTIDISCIPLINARY HOSPITAL IN DYNAMIC OVER 5 YEARS (2017-2021) METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING CT VOLUMETRY OF THE LIVER IN RELATED TRANSPLANTATION CURRENT ISSUES OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RADIOLOGICAL STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE GUARANTEED VOLUME OF FREE MEDICAL CARE AND IN THE SYSTEM OF MANDATORY SOCIAL HEALTH INSURANCE INTENSIVE CARE SERVICE OPTIMIZATION FOR COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN ALMATY CITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1