A Novel Approach to Looking at the Role of Autonomy Support in the Development of Passion in Education

Tanya Chichekian, S. Rahimi, Jérémie Verner-Filion, R. Vallerand
{"title":"A Novel Approach to Looking at the Role of Autonomy Support in the Development of Passion in Education","authors":"Tanya Chichekian, S. Rahimi, Jérémie Verner-Filion, R. Vallerand","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/dyc4b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current research demonstrates a novel approach to investigating the role ofperceived teacher and parental autonomy support in college students’ ( N = 970 with376 males, 594 females) passion for science. Based on the Dualistic Model of Passionwhich posits the existence of a harmonious (HP) and obsessive (OP) passion, weadopted a 2 x 2 model (Gaudreau & Thompson, 2010) to test if low and high levels ofperceived parental and teacher autonomy support were differentially associated withstudents’ harmonious and obsessive passion. First, students' perceptions of high levels of both teacher and parental autonomy support rendered the highest means in HP and OP. Second, students who demonstrated high levels of only teacher autonomy support also displayed high levels of HP and OP. Third, OP levels were lowest when teacher autonomy support was low, while those from parents were high. Finally, perceived low support from both parents and teachers was not as ideal as having only support from parents to keep OP at the lowest levels. In sum, the results demonstrate the benefits of having both forms of autonomy support and highlight the outcomes associated with single-sided or low support. Practical implications highlight the importance of considering sources outside of students’ immediate learning environment when designing interventions based on autonomy support.","PeriodicalId":356396,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 AERA Annual Meeting","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 AERA Annual Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/dyc4b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current research demonstrates a novel approach to investigating the role ofperceived teacher and parental autonomy support in college students’ ( N = 970 with376 males, 594 females) passion for science. Based on the Dualistic Model of Passionwhich posits the existence of a harmonious (HP) and obsessive (OP) passion, weadopted a 2 x 2 model (Gaudreau & Thompson, 2010) to test if low and high levels ofperceived parental and teacher autonomy support were differentially associated withstudents’ harmonious and obsessive passion. First, students' perceptions of high levels of both teacher and parental autonomy support rendered the highest means in HP and OP. Second, students who demonstrated high levels of only teacher autonomy support also displayed high levels of HP and OP. Third, OP levels were lowest when teacher autonomy support was low, while those from parents were high. Finally, perceived low support from both parents and teachers was not as ideal as having only support from parents to keep OP at the lowest levels. In sum, the results demonstrate the benefits of having both forms of autonomy support and highlight the outcomes associated with single-sided or low support. Practical implications highlight the importance of considering sources outside of students’ immediate learning environment when designing interventions based on autonomy support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自主支持在教育激情发展中的作用
本研究展示了一种新的方法来调查感知教师和父母自主支持在大学生(N = 970,其中376名男性,594名女性)科学热情中的作用。基于假设存在一种和谐激情(HP)和强迫性激情(OP)的二元激情模型,我们采用了一个2 × 2模型(Gaudreau & Thompson, 2010)来测试低水平和高水平的感知父母和教师自主支持是否与学生的和谐激情和强迫性激情存在差异。首先,同时拥有高水平教师和家长自主支持的学生在HP和OP中表现出最高的水平。其次,仅拥有高水平教师自主支持的学生也表现出高水平的HP和OP。第三,当教师自主支持水平较低时,OP水平最低,而来自家长的支持水平较高。最后,来自父母和老师的低支持并不像只有父母的支持将OP保持在最低水平那样理想。总而言之,研究结果证明了拥有两种形式的自主支持的好处,并突出了与单方或低支持相关的结果。实践意义强调了在设计基于自主支持的干预措施时考虑学生直接学习环境之外的资源的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining the Role of Epistemic Empathy in Responsive Teaching "Deprived and Disadvantaged": Federal Advocacy for Gifted Youth in the United States, 1965–1975 Exploring the College Choice of Latinx Students in Rural Texas The Emergence of Teacher Self in the Elementary Classroom Different or Differentiated? Recoupling Policy and Practice in an Era of Accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1