Adnexal torsion: experience at a single university center.

T. Ogburn, J. Wurzel, E. Espey, David K. Espey
{"title":"Adnexal torsion: experience at a single university center.","authors":"T. Ogburn, J. Wurzel, E. Espey, David K. Espey","doi":"10.1097/01.ogx.0000197839.53914.f4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo review the management of adnexal torsion over an 11-year period at a single institution and to assess trends in the surgical approach, including laparoscopy vs. laparotomy, and ovarian conservation vs. removal.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nA chart review of all patients treated for adnexal torsion at the University of New Mexico from 1990 to 2001 was performed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSixty-eight cases of adnexal torsion were identified. Laparoscopic management was accomplished in 22 cases (32%) and ovarian conservation in 14 cases (20.6%). There were no differences in the use of laparoscopy (OR 2.24, CI 0.65-7.93), or ovarian conservation (OR 1.24, CI 0.31-5.35) in patients treated before 1996 vs. later in the study period.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nDespite evidence supporting conservative management of adnexal torsion with laparoscopy and ovarian conservation, most cases at our institution are managed with open laparotomy and removal of the affected adnexa.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000197839.53914.f4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To review the management of adnexal torsion over an 11-year period at a single institution and to assess trends in the surgical approach, including laparoscopy vs. laparotomy, and ovarian conservation vs. removal. STUDY DESIGN A chart review of all patients treated for adnexal torsion at the University of New Mexico from 1990 to 2001 was performed. RESULTS Sixty-eight cases of adnexal torsion were identified. Laparoscopic management was accomplished in 22 cases (32%) and ovarian conservation in 14 cases (20.6%). There were no differences in the use of laparoscopy (OR 2.24, CI 0.65-7.93), or ovarian conservation (OR 1.24, CI 0.31-5.35) in patients treated before 1996 vs. later in the study period. CONCLUSION Despite evidence supporting conservative management of adnexal torsion with laparoscopy and ovarian conservation, most cases at our institution are managed with open laparotomy and removal of the affected adnexa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
附件扭转:在一个大学中心的经验。
目的回顾一所医院11年来附件扭转的治疗情况,并评估手术方法的发展趋势,包括腹腔镜手术与剖腹手术,卵巢保留与切除。研究设计对1990年至2001年在新墨西哥大学治疗附件扭转的所有患者进行了图表回顾。结果共确诊附件扭转68例。腹腔镜治疗22例(32%),卵巢保存14例(20.6%)。在1996年之前和研究后期治疗的患者中,腹腔镜检查的使用(OR 2.24, CI 0.65-7.93)和卵巢保护(OR 1.24, CI 0.31-5.35)没有差异。结论尽管有证据支持腹腔镜和卵巢保护对附件扭转的保守治疗,但我们机构的大多数病例都采用开腹手术和切除受影响的附件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Risk Factors Do Not Predict Shoulder Dystocia. Timing of Referral to the New England Trophoblastic Disease Center: Does Referral with Molar Pregnancy Versus Postmolar Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Affect Outcomes? Quantitative Assessment of Endometrial Volume and Uterine Vascularity and Pregnancy Outcome in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles. Birth Outcomes by Infertility Diagnosis Analyses of the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART). Blood Contaminated Amniotic Fluid and the Lamellar Body Count Fetal Lung Maturity Test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1