[New criteria for secondary decay and marginal defects].

A B Tveit, I Espelid, I A Mjör, H M Eriksen, V Oiestad, A Fjelltveit
{"title":"[New criteria for secondary decay and marginal defects].","authors":"A B Tveit,&nbsp;I Espelid,&nbsp;I A Mjör,&nbsp;H M Eriksen,&nbsp;V Oiestad,&nbsp;A Fjelltveit","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The survival time of restorations and the reasons for replacements vary considerably from one study to another. Different studies report that secondary caries alone accounts for 0-60% of the reasons. Great variations in treatment planning have been reported when dentists examine the same restorations. Different diagnostic criteria and treatment strategy are probably responsible for most of the variations. In this article specific criteria for secondary caries and marginal defects are presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":75780,"journal":{"name":"Den Norske tannlaegeforenings tidende","volume":"100 16","pages":"652-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Den Norske tannlaegeforenings tidende","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The survival time of restorations and the reasons for replacements vary considerably from one study to another. Different studies report that secondary caries alone accounts for 0-60% of the reasons. Great variations in treatment planning have been reported when dentists examine the same restorations. Different diagnostic criteria and treatment strategy are probably responsible for most of the variations. In this article specific criteria for secondary caries and marginal defects are presented.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[二次衰减和边缘缺陷的新标准]。
修复体的存活时间和更换的原因在不同的研究中差异很大。不同的研究报告表明,仅继发性龋齿就占了0-60%的原因。据报道,当牙医检查相同的修复体时,治疗计划的差异很大。不同的诊断标准和治疗策略可能是造成大多数差异的原因。本文提出了继发性龋病和边缘缺陷的具体标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Pelicans]. [Use of mercury in medicine and dentistry. Historical reflections]. [What happens to patients referred for implant evaluation? Treatment choice and patient response]. [Periodontal epidemiology and the estimate of treatment needs]. [Alzheimer's disease--a challenge for dental personnel].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1