{"title":"Control of Hospital Acquired Infection in Bangladesh - An Endeavor to be Strengthened","authors":"J. Haq","doi":"10.3329/IMCJ.V6I2.14726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nosocomial or hospital acquired infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality of patients attending the healthcare facilities all over the world. The issue of infection associated with medical practice probably dates back to over two thousand years when the medical healer started to practice surgical procedures.1 In the last two hundred years it has emerged as a matter of great concern with the rapid advancement of medical science. In the 1800s as many as 80% of all operations ended in infection. 2 For a long time medics refused to acknowledge the fact that infection could be afflicted by the healer during treatment until in mid 19th century, when Ignaz Philip Semmelweis in Vienna demonstrated the relationship between hand washing with chlorinated water and reduction of puerperal sepsis. He successfully demonstrated a dramatic reduction in the incidence of puerperal sepsis from over 8% to 2.3 % only by insisting on stringent hand washing with a solution of chlorinated water.2 The importance of controlling hospital infection was finally recognized by the work of Joseph Lister in mid sixties of 19th century by publication of his landmark paper ‘On the Antiseptic Principle in the Practice of Surgery’ in the British Medical Journal. He recognized the role of microbes and the use of carbolic acid, an antiseptic solution, in controlling surgical wound infections. These observations provided the basis for control of hospital acquired infections and thereby the importance of infection control was conceptualized. However, the introduction of penicillin in 1941 brought a negative blow to infection control practices in hospitals on a false perception that ‘penicillin the magic bullet’ would readily alleviate this problem. As a result, there was rapid decline in interest in hospital infection control activities. But this euphoria did not last long because of the outbreak of large staphylococcal pandemics in the 1950s which resulted in renewed interest on infection control programs in hospitals.3","PeriodicalId":226732,"journal":{"name":"Ibrahim Medical College Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibrahim Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/IMCJ.V6I2.14726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Nosocomial or hospital acquired infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality of patients attending the healthcare facilities all over the world. The issue of infection associated with medical practice probably dates back to over two thousand years when the medical healer started to practice surgical procedures.1 In the last two hundred years it has emerged as a matter of great concern with the rapid advancement of medical science. In the 1800s as many as 80% of all operations ended in infection. 2 For a long time medics refused to acknowledge the fact that infection could be afflicted by the healer during treatment until in mid 19th century, when Ignaz Philip Semmelweis in Vienna demonstrated the relationship between hand washing with chlorinated water and reduction of puerperal sepsis. He successfully demonstrated a dramatic reduction in the incidence of puerperal sepsis from over 8% to 2.3 % only by insisting on stringent hand washing with a solution of chlorinated water.2 The importance of controlling hospital infection was finally recognized by the work of Joseph Lister in mid sixties of 19th century by publication of his landmark paper ‘On the Antiseptic Principle in the Practice of Surgery’ in the British Medical Journal. He recognized the role of microbes and the use of carbolic acid, an antiseptic solution, in controlling surgical wound infections. These observations provided the basis for control of hospital acquired infections and thereby the importance of infection control was conceptualized. However, the introduction of penicillin in 1941 brought a negative blow to infection control practices in hospitals on a false perception that ‘penicillin the magic bullet’ would readily alleviate this problem. As a result, there was rapid decline in interest in hospital infection control activities. But this euphoria did not last long because of the outbreak of large staphylococcal pandemics in the 1950s which resulted in renewed interest on infection control programs in hospitals.3
院内或医院获得性感染是全世界在医疗机构就诊的患者发病和死亡的主要原因。与医疗实践有关的感染问题可能可以追溯到两千多年前,当时医生开始实践外科手术在过去的两百年里,随着医学科学的迅速发展,它已经成为一个备受关注的问题。在19世纪,多达80%的手术以感染告终。在很长一段时间里,医生们都拒绝承认治疗者在治疗过程中可能会感染这一事实,直到19世纪中叶,维也纳的伊格纳兹·菲利普·塞梅尔韦斯(Ignaz Philip Semmelweis)证明了用氯化水洗手与减少产褥期败血症之间的关系。他成功地证明了仅通过坚持用氯化水溶液严格洗手,就能将产褥期败血症的发生率从8%大幅降低到2.3%控制医院感染的重要性最终被约瑟夫·李斯特在19世纪60年代中期的工作所认识到,他在英国医学杂志上发表了具有里程碑意义的论文《外科手术中的消毒原则》。他认识到微生物的作用和使用石炭酸(一种防腐溶液)来控制手术伤口感染。这些观察结果为医院获得性感染的控制提供了依据,从而认识到感染控制的重要性。然而,1941年青霉素的引入给医院的感染控制实践带来了负面打击,因为人们错误地认为“青霉素是灵丹妙药”会轻易缓解这个问题。结果,人们对医院感染控制活动的兴趣迅速下降。但这种兴奋并没有持续多久,因为20世纪50年代葡萄球菌大流行的爆发,重新引起了人们对医院感染控制项目的兴趣