A Comparison of Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches for Time Series Forecasting in a Demand Management Scenario

Anton Pfeifer, Hendrik Brand, V. Lohweg
{"title":"A Comparison of Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches for Time Series Forecasting in a Demand Management Scenario","authors":"Anton Pfeifer, Hendrik Brand, V. Lohweg","doi":"10.1109/INDIN51400.2023.10218206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing size and complexity of datasets, the need for constant adaptation to current conditions, and the potential benefits of machine learning (ML) techniques, such as flexibility and the ability to incorporate additional features, have led to the increasing use of ML techniques in forecasting as an alternative to traditional statistical methods. However, the results are often not transferable to smaller datasets. This paper analyses a real inventory management dataset and compares statistical and ML methods to determine which techniques consistently produce accurate results, even for smaller datasets. The results show that the choice of aggregation level affects the performance of statistical and ML methods, with the LightGBM model showing consistent performance across different scenarios and aggregation levels, and simpler methods effectively modelling intermittent or lumpy time series.","PeriodicalId":174443,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 21st International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 21st International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN51400.2023.10218206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing size and complexity of datasets, the need for constant adaptation to current conditions, and the potential benefits of machine learning (ML) techniques, such as flexibility and the ability to incorporate additional features, have led to the increasing use of ML techniques in forecasting as an alternative to traditional statistical methods. However, the results are often not transferable to smaller datasets. This paper analyses a real inventory management dataset and compares statistical and ML methods to determine which techniques consistently produce accurate results, even for smaller datasets. The results show that the choice of aggregation level affects the performance of statistical and ML methods, with the LightGBM model showing consistent performance across different scenarios and aggregation levels, and simpler methods effectively modelling intermittent or lumpy time series.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需求管理场景中时间序列预测的统计和机器学习方法比较
数据集的规模和复杂性不断增加,需要不断适应当前条件,以及机器学习(ML)技术的潜在好处,例如灵活性和整合额外功能的能力,导致ML技术越来越多地用于预测,作为传统统计方法的替代方案。然而,结果往往不能转移到较小的数据集。本文分析了一个真实的库存管理数据集,并比较了统计方法和机器学习方法,以确定哪种技术始终产生准确的结果,即使对于较小的数据集也是如此。结果表明,聚合级别的选择会影响统计和ML方法的性能,LightGBM模型在不同场景和聚合级别上表现出一致的性能,而更简单的方法可以有效地建模间歇性或块状时间序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technical Debt Management in Industrial ML - State of Practice and Management Model Proposal Measuring the Robustness of ML Models Against Data Quality Issues in Industrial Time Series Data 5G packet delay considerations for different 5G-TSN communication scenarios Non-Interventional Precise TC Assessment for Enhancing Consumer Energy Flexibility Model-based Automation of TSN Configuration for Industrial Distributed Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1