Expert Assessment of the Quality of Remote Educational Resources

Andrrii Guraliuk, I. Varava, S. Holovko, L. Shapenko, Veronika Oleshchenko
{"title":"Expert Assessment of the Quality of Remote Educational Resources","authors":"Andrrii Guraliuk, I. Varava, S. Holovko, L. Shapenko, Veronika Oleshchenko","doi":"10.3991/ijep.v13i1.36121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of scientific works in the field of education showed that one of the problems of the educational process is the assessment of its quality. Many authors consider the qualimetric approach to be the most effective approach to the practical implementation of such an assessment. \nWhile agreeing with scientists who study the application of qualimetry to as-sess the quality of education, the authors of this article focus on the use of the re-source approach. Consider the educational process itself as a set of these resources, united by defined interactions. This approach will allow individualization of learning both at the student level. \nWe consider the technology of constructing factor-criteria models with the involvement of specialized specialists in their development. This approach is based on the numerical interpretation of the results obtained using the method of expert assessments. We also offer the tools we have developed (either a special-ized program or a set of criteria for evaluation) to support the peer review of elec-tronic resources. We show that this toolkit, with minor changes, is applicable to the evaluation (ranking by qualitative features) of arbitrary resources of the educational process, which have such a characteristic as quality. \nIn addition, the use of the proposed approach makes it possible to use quali-metric monitoring as a tool for the educational process. In other words, to track the dynamics of changes in the state of the resources of the educational process and, using statistical methods, to establish their impact on the final result of education.","PeriodicalId":170699,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Eng. Pedagog.","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Eng. Pedagog.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v13i1.36121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The analysis of scientific works in the field of education showed that one of the problems of the educational process is the assessment of its quality. Many authors consider the qualimetric approach to be the most effective approach to the practical implementation of such an assessment. While agreeing with scientists who study the application of qualimetry to as-sess the quality of education, the authors of this article focus on the use of the re-source approach. Consider the educational process itself as a set of these resources, united by defined interactions. This approach will allow individualization of learning both at the student level. We consider the technology of constructing factor-criteria models with the involvement of specialized specialists in their development. This approach is based on the numerical interpretation of the results obtained using the method of expert assessments. We also offer the tools we have developed (either a special-ized program or a set of criteria for evaluation) to support the peer review of elec-tronic resources. We show that this toolkit, with minor changes, is applicable to the evaluation (ranking by qualitative features) of arbitrary resources of the educational process, which have such a characteristic as quality. In addition, the use of the proposed approach makes it possible to use quali-metric monitoring as a tool for the educational process. In other words, to track the dynamics of changes in the state of the resources of the educational process and, using statistical methods, to establish their impact on the final result of education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程教育资源质量的专家评价
对教育领域科学工作的分析表明,教育过程的问题之一是对教育质量的评价。许多作者认为定性方法是实现这种评估的最有效的方法。虽然同意研究质量测量法应用于评估教育质量的科学家的观点,但本文的作者关注的是资源方法的使用。把教育过程本身看作是这些资源的集合,这些资源是通过定义的相互作用统一起来的。这种方法将在学生层面实现个性化学习。我们考虑了在专家的参与下构建因素标准模型的技术。这种方法是基于对使用专家评估方法获得的结果进行数值解释。我们还提供我们开发的工具(一个专门的程序或一套评估标准)来支持电子资源的同行评审。我们表明,这个工具包,与微小的变化,适用于评估(通过定性特征排名)的任意资源的教育过程,这具有这样的特征,如质量。此外,使用拟议的方法可以使用质量度量监测作为教育过程的工具。换句话说,跟踪教育过程中资源状态变化的动态,并使用统计方法确定它们对最终教育结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mobile Application with Augmented Reality as a Support Tool for Learning Human Anatomy Investigating the Role of Augmented Reality in Supporting Collaborative Learning in Science Education: A Case Study Perception of Engineering Students on Social Constructivist Learning Approach in Classroom Ways of Being Smart in Engineering: Beliefs, Values, and Introductory Engineering Experiences The Impact of Two Proposed Strategies Based on Active Learning on Students' Achievement at the Computer and Their Social Intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1