Measuring quality of life in medicine.

I Wiklund
{"title":"Measuring quality of life in medicine.","authors":"I Wiklund","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quality of life has emerged as an important outcome in evaluating medical care. With an increasing number of patients with chronic disease, it is necessary not only to assess an intervention regarding its ability to effect cures, but also regarding its ability to improve the quality of life. Self-administered patient questionnaires provide a reliable and valid means of assessing how patients respond to therapy. Basically, there are two types: specific and general questionnaires. Whereas general questionnaires give a comprehensive evaluation of the quality of life summarized in a global score, specific questionnaires are focused on a particular problem or patient group. Benefits and disadvantages of generic compared with specific questionnaires are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77619,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of primary health care. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of primary health care. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quality of life has emerged as an important outcome in evaluating medical care. With an increasing number of patients with chronic disease, it is necessary not only to assess an intervention regarding its ability to effect cures, but also regarding its ability to improve the quality of life. Self-administered patient questionnaires provide a reliable and valid means of assessing how patients respond to therapy. Basically, there are two types: specific and general questionnaires. Whereas general questionnaires give a comprehensive evaluation of the quality of life summarized in a global score, specific questionnaires are focused on a particular problem or patient group. Benefits and disadvantages of generic compared with specific questionnaires are discussed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医学上衡量生活质量。
生活质量已成为评估医疗保健的一个重要结果。随着慢性病患者数量的增加,不仅有必要评估干预措施的治愈能力,而且还需要评估其改善生活质量的能力。自我管理的患者问卷提供了一种可靠和有效的方法来评估患者对治疗的反应。基本上,有两种类型:具体和一般的问卷。一般问卷对生活质量进行综合评估,总结出一个整体评分,而特定问卷则侧重于一个特定的问题或患者群体。讨论了通用问卷与特定问卷的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Central Research Unit of General Practice: a personal review after 22 years. Research in general practice--achievements in the past and possibilities for the future. Poul A. Pedersen--the first among pioneers. Can general practitioners be randomised? Situational disease: elements of a social theory of disease based on a study of back trouble.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1