N Confalonieri, R Simonatti, V Ramondetta, L Centanni
{"title":"[Intramedullary nailing with a Rush pin in the treatment of diaphyseal humeral fractures].","authors":"N Confalonieri, R Simonatti, V Ramondetta, L Centanni","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors discuss their 20 years of experience in the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus with Rush-type intramedullary nailing. The various operative and nonoperative methods for the treatment of this type of fracture are critically analyzed. The results were excellent in 60.5% of the cases, good in 29.6%, and poor in only 9.9%, in which healing was over 4 months late and a hypotrophic callus was present. The advantages of this treatment are as follows: adequate reduction of the fracture, simplicity of execution, good results, and shorter period of immobilization compared to other methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":75545,"journal":{"name":"Archivio \"Putti\" di chirurgia degli organi di movimento","volume":"38 2","pages":"395-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio \"Putti\" di chirurgia degli organi di movimento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The authors discuss their 20 years of experience in the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus with Rush-type intramedullary nailing. The various operative and nonoperative methods for the treatment of this type of fracture are critically analyzed. The results were excellent in 60.5% of the cases, good in 29.6%, and poor in only 9.9%, in which healing was over 4 months late and a hypotrophic callus was present. The advantages of this treatment are as follows: adequate reduction of the fracture, simplicity of execution, good results, and shorter period of immobilization compared to other methods.