CrowdRE in a Governmental Setting: Lessons from Two Case Studies

J. Wouters, R. Janssen, Bas van Hulst, J. Veenhuizen, F. Dalpiaz, S. Brinkkemper
{"title":"CrowdRE in a Governmental Setting: Lessons from Two Case Studies","authors":"J. Wouters, R. Janssen, Bas van Hulst, J. Veenhuizen, F. Dalpiaz, S. Brinkkemper","doi":"10.1109/RE51729.2021.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crowd-based Requirements Engineering, or CrowdRE, is a recent paradigm that promotes the active participation of a large number of stakeholders in RE. In CrowdRE, requirements elicitation can be crowdsourced by creating an online platform that allows stakeholders to formulate ideas regarding the specific product. Although some case studies on crowd-based elicitation exist, no conclusive evidence can be derived on the effectiveness of such techniques. In this paper, we study crowd-based elicitation within a large governmental organization. We conduct two case studies of CrowdRE within the Royal Netherlands Marechaussee. For this, we construct the KMar-Crowd method, which adapts CrowdRE ideas to the needs of governmental organizations. While one case compares the crowd-generated ideas with requirements elicited via interviews and similar techniques, the other measures the usefulness of the gathered ideas for a product for which no prior elicitation was conducted. The results of the case studies, which attracted larger crowds than in previous studies, indicate that CrowdRE can be successfully applied to engage the users of a software product in requirements elicitation. Contradicting earlier studies, the inclusion of gamification elements in the CrowdRE method did not increase the motivation to participate, possibly due to the nature of governmental organizations.","PeriodicalId":440285,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE51729.2021.00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Crowd-based Requirements Engineering, or CrowdRE, is a recent paradigm that promotes the active participation of a large number of stakeholders in RE. In CrowdRE, requirements elicitation can be crowdsourced by creating an online platform that allows stakeholders to formulate ideas regarding the specific product. Although some case studies on crowd-based elicitation exist, no conclusive evidence can be derived on the effectiveness of such techniques. In this paper, we study crowd-based elicitation within a large governmental organization. We conduct two case studies of CrowdRE within the Royal Netherlands Marechaussee. For this, we construct the KMar-Crowd method, which adapts CrowdRE ideas to the needs of governmental organizations. While one case compares the crowd-generated ideas with requirements elicited via interviews and similar techniques, the other measures the usefulness of the gathered ideas for a product for which no prior elicitation was conducted. The results of the case studies, which attracted larger crowds than in previous studies, indicate that CrowdRE can be successfully applied to engage the users of a software product in requirements elicitation. Contradicting earlier studies, the inclusion of gamification elements in the CrowdRE method did not increase the motivation to participate, possibly due to the nature of governmental organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政府环境中的CrowdRE:来自两个案例的教训
基于群体的需求工程(Crowd-based Requirements Engineering,简称CrowdRE)是最近的一个范例,它促进了大量涉众在需求工程中的积极参与。在CrowdRE中,需求的提取可以通过创建一个在线平台来众包,该平台允许涉众就特定产品制定想法。虽然存在一些关于以人群为基础的启发的案例研究,但无法得出关于这种技术有效性的结论性证据。在本文中,我们研究了一个大型政府组织内部的基于群体的启发。我们对荷兰皇家宪兵队的CrowdRE进行了两个案例研究。为此,我们构建了KMar-Crowd方法,将CrowdRE思想与政府组织的需求相结合。其中一个案例将大众产生的想法与通过访谈和类似技术获得的需求进行比较,另一个案例衡量的是收集到的想法对没有事先进行启发的产品的有用性。案例研究的结果,比以前的研究吸引了更多的人,表明CrowdRE可以成功地应用于软件产品的用户参与需求引出。与早期的研究相反,在CrowdRE方法中加入游戏化元素并没有增加参与的动机,这可能与政府组织的性质有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Welcome from the RE 2021 Organizers On the Role of User Feedback in Software Evolution: a Practitioners’ Perspective Agile Teams’ Perception in Privacy Requirements Elicitation: LGPD’s compliance in Brazil Pri-AwaRE: Tool Support for priority-aware decision-making under uncertainty Environment-Driven Abstraction Identification for Requirements-Based Testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1