[Bone mass in males. A comparison between dual-photon densitometry of the lumbar spine and the whole body].

M Parrini, M Gallazzi, C Verdoia
{"title":"[Bone mass in males. A comparison between dual-photon densitometry of the lumbar spine and the whole body].","authors":"M Parrini,&nbsp;M Gallazzi,&nbsp;C Verdoia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to evaluate the validity of a new method for measuring the whole body mineral content in diagnosing senile osteoporosis we studied 3 groups of male subjects: the first one composed by 40 young healthy subjects (mean age 24.7 years), the second composed by 40 normal patients (mean age 51.3 years); the 3rd group consisted of 26 elderly patients affected with typical osteoporotic fractures (mean age 77 years). All of them underwent a measurement of the spine as well as whole body mineral content performed with a dual photon absorptiometer. The measurements showed a decreasing in mineral content in the second versus the first group but a high correlation coefficient between spine and WB measurements characterized both groups; a striking decrease of it (r = 0.22) was found in the 3rd group. The relative unreliability of the spine measurement in elderly is probably due to the age-linked anatomical alteration. We therefore conclude that WB measurement must be considered the method of choice for the detection of senile osteoporosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":75545,"journal":{"name":"Archivio \"Putti\" di chirurgia degli organi di movimento","volume":"38 1","pages":"171-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio \"Putti\" di chirurgia degli organi di movimento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to evaluate the validity of a new method for measuring the whole body mineral content in diagnosing senile osteoporosis we studied 3 groups of male subjects: the first one composed by 40 young healthy subjects (mean age 24.7 years), the second composed by 40 normal patients (mean age 51.3 years); the 3rd group consisted of 26 elderly patients affected with typical osteoporotic fractures (mean age 77 years). All of them underwent a measurement of the spine as well as whole body mineral content performed with a dual photon absorptiometer. The measurements showed a decreasing in mineral content in the second versus the first group but a high correlation coefficient between spine and WB measurements characterized both groups; a striking decrease of it (r = 0.22) was found in the 3rd group. The relative unreliability of the spine measurement in elderly is probably due to the age-linked anatomical alteration. We therefore conclude that WB measurement must be considered the method of choice for the detection of senile osteoporosis.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男性的骨量。腰椎与全身双光子密度测量的比较[j]。
为了评价一种新的全身矿物质含量测定方法在诊断老年性骨质疏松症中的有效性,我们研究了3组男性受试者:第一组由40名年轻健康者组成(平均年龄24.7岁),第二组由40名正常患者组成(平均年龄51.3岁);第三组为典型骨质疏松性骨折的老年患者26例(平均年龄77岁)。所有患者均采用双光子吸收计测量脊柱和全身矿物质含量。测量结果显示,与第一组相比,第二组的矿物质含量有所下降,但两组的脊柱和胸径测量结果之间存在较高的相关系数;第三组明显降低(r = 0.22)。老年人脊柱测量的相对不可靠可能是由于年龄相关的解剖改变。因此,我们得出结论,WB测量必须被认为是检测老年性骨质疏松症的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Glomus tumor: rare localization in the knee]. [Rare localization of a glomus tumor in the knee]. [Non-cemented reimplantation of failed hip prosthesis]. [Familial metaphyseal dysplasia: incidental detection of an osteochondroma]. [Morphologic scanning electron microscopic study of quantitative variations in the endosseous diaphyseal surface in normal and osteoporotic rats].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1