A Review and Analysis: Does Amplification Experience Have an Effect on Preferred Gain over Time?

E. Convery, G. Keidser, H. Dillon
{"title":"A Review and Analysis: Does Amplification Experience Have an Effect on Preferred Gain over Time?","authors":"E. Convery, G. Keidser, H. Dillon","doi":"10.1375/AUDI.2005.27.1.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a widespread belief among practising audiologists that new users of hearing aids prefer lower gain levels than experienced hearing aid users and that new users will gradually come to prefer higher gain levels over time. A review of 14 papers was conducted to determine the validity of this belief and the data from three of the studies (Cox & Alexander, 1992; Horwitz & Turner, 1997; Humes et al., 2002) were then examined in closer detail. The audiometric data for 175 subjects, for whom use gain was measured at various intervals postfitting, was divided into 'new' (N = 98) and 'experienced' (N = 77) groups. For each of these subjects, the NAL-R target was calculated and the prescribed gain was compared to the use gain. An analysis of these data, along with the conclusions of the other papers reviewed here, suggests that there is no significant difference between the gain preferences of new and experienced hearing aid users, nor do the gain preferences of new users change over the first 12 months of hearing aid use.","PeriodicalId":114768,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.2005.27.1.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

There is a widespread belief among practising audiologists that new users of hearing aids prefer lower gain levels than experienced hearing aid users and that new users will gradually come to prefer higher gain levels over time. A review of 14 papers was conducted to determine the validity of this belief and the data from three of the studies (Cox & Alexander, 1992; Horwitz & Turner, 1997; Humes et al., 2002) were then examined in closer detail. The audiometric data for 175 subjects, for whom use gain was measured at various intervals postfitting, was divided into 'new' (N = 98) and 'experienced' (N = 77) groups. For each of these subjects, the NAL-R target was calculated and the prescribed gain was compared to the use gain. An analysis of these data, along with the conclusions of the other papers reviewed here, suggests that there is no significant difference between the gain preferences of new and experienced hearing aid users, nor do the gain preferences of new users change over the first 12 months of hearing aid use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾和分析:随着时间的推移,放大经验对首选增益有影响吗?
执业听力学家普遍认为,新助听器使用者比有经验的助听器使用者更喜欢较低的增益水平,而随着时间的推移,新助听器使用者会逐渐喜欢较高的增益水平。对14篇论文进行了回顾,以确定这一信念的有效性和其中三项研究的数据(Cox & Alexander, 1992;Horwitz & Turner, 1997;Humes et al., 2002)随后进行了更详细的研究。175名受试者的听力测量数据被分为“新”组(N = 98)和“有经验”组(N = 77),他们在不同的时间间隔内测量使用增益。对于每个受试者,计算NAL-R目标,并将规定增益与使用增益进行比较。对这些数据的分析,以及本文回顾的其他论文的结论表明,新助听器用户和有经验的助听器用户的增益偏好之间没有显着差异,新用户的增益偏好在助听器使用的前12个月内也没有变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rehabilitation Efforts and Stress in Parents of Children With Cochlear Implants Communicating with Australian Deaf People about Communication Technology Student Audiologists' Impressions of a Simulation Training Program An Independent Review of Neuromonics Tinnitus Treatment Controlled Clinical Trials A Pilot Investigation into the Provision of Hearing Services Using Tele-audiology to Remote Areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1