Women, Migration and Labour Exploitation: Challenging Frameworks

B. Pattadath, Roshni Chattopadhyay, Meena Gopal, L. Arocha
{"title":"Women, Migration and Labour Exploitation: Challenging Frameworks","authors":"B. Pattadath, Roshni Chattopadhyay, Meena Gopal, L. Arocha","doi":"10.36931/jma.2020.2.2.22-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Migration narratives often resist incorporating a gendered lens, thereby erasing or failing to account for the ‘herstories’ of women, and for persons from marginal backgrounds who move in search of freedom, survival and autonomy. This is not dissimilar to how women’s work, especially when exploitative, has been conceptualised to date. Often formulated as social-reproductive work, this conceptual framework has failed to address the normative considerations that continue to devalue women’s work by frequently seeing it in juxtaposition to productive (valuable) work, complementary and subordinate to it. Despite decades of feminist attention to this and sustained efforts at visibilising women’s work, it has not yet overcome established configurations and grammars that continue to subordinate it. In this article, we consider two case studies in India to highlight some of these persistent blinders that attempt to render visible the situation of women who migrate for work. Focusing on these women’s experiences as migrants and workers, and their efforts to address their precarious and exploitative conditions, allows us to not only reflect on the challenges in better conceptualising these women’s lives but more importantly, to identify what these struggles say about the Indian women’s movement. In both cases, migrant women workers have built solidarity alliances with other women’s networks, and these are fundamental to re-energising the movement.","PeriodicalId":247619,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Migration Affairs","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Migration Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36931/jma.2020.2.2.22-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Migration narratives often resist incorporating a gendered lens, thereby erasing or failing to account for the ‘herstories’ of women, and for persons from marginal backgrounds who move in search of freedom, survival and autonomy. This is not dissimilar to how women’s work, especially when exploitative, has been conceptualised to date. Often formulated as social-reproductive work, this conceptual framework has failed to address the normative considerations that continue to devalue women’s work by frequently seeing it in juxtaposition to productive (valuable) work, complementary and subordinate to it. Despite decades of feminist attention to this and sustained efforts at visibilising women’s work, it has not yet overcome established configurations and grammars that continue to subordinate it. In this article, we consider two case studies in India to highlight some of these persistent blinders that attempt to render visible the situation of women who migrate for work. Focusing on these women’s experiences as migrants and workers, and their efforts to address their precarious and exploitative conditions, allows us to not only reflect on the challenges in better conceptualising these women’s lives but more importantly, to identify what these struggles say about the Indian women’s movement. In both cases, migrant women workers have built solidarity alliances with other women’s networks, and these are fundamental to re-energising the movement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女、移徙和劳动剥削:具有挑战性的框架
移民叙事往往拒绝纳入性别视角,从而抹去或未能解释妇女的“她的故事”,以及来自边缘背景的人为寻求自由、生存和自主而迁移。这与迄今为止对妇女的工作,特别是在受剥削的情况下的工作的概念没有什么不同。这一概念框架通常被表述为社会-生殖工作,未能处理继续贬低妇女工作的规范性考虑,因为经常将妇女工作与生产性(有价值的)工作并列、互补和从属。尽管女权主义者几十年来一直关注这一点,并持续努力使妇女的工作具体化,但它仍未克服继续使其处于从属地位的既定结构和语法。在本文中,我们考虑了印度的两个案例研究,以突出这些持续存在的障碍,这些障碍试图使外出工作的妇女的处境变得清晰可见。关注这些妇女作为移民和工人的经历,以及她们为解决不稳定和受剥削状况所做的努力,不仅可以让我们反思更好地概念化这些妇女生活的挑战,更重要的是,确定这些斗争对印度妇女运动的影响。在这两种情况下,移徙女工都与其他妇女网络建立了团结联盟,这是重新激发运动的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Land to Call One’s Own: Looking at Attia Hosain’s Essay Deep Roots to Understand Her Sense of Belonging/Alienation as a Migrant Book Review. Ghoshal, Anindita. 2022. Revisiting Partition: Contestation, Narratives and Memories Naipaul’s India: A Million Mutinies Now: Reshaping the Migrant’s Sensibility Revealed through his Diasporic Re-search in India Bearing Witness to Racial Hatred and Challenging Patriarchy: An Intersectional Approach to Violet Cannon’s Migration Memoir, Gypsy Princess: The True Story of a Romany Childhood Reclamation of the Istanbul City and the Migrant Flâneuse in Elif Shafak’s10 Minutes 38 Seconds in This Strange World
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1