M&A and Employee Turnover: Who’s Leaving?

Juan Martin Carriquiry
{"title":"M&A and Employee Turnover: Who’s Leaving?","authors":"Juan Martin Carriquiry","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2903220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the worldwide growth of mergers and acquisitions (M&As), a number of studies in recent years have called their relative success into question. One reason for the poor performance of a number of deals may be negative employee reactions, such as employee turnover. Despite the widespread perception that M&As often lead to employee turnover, there is surprisingly weak empirical support provided in the literature. In particular, we know notably little regarding the characteristics of those who are departing. In this study, I address this gap by using a unique dataset resulting from the merger of Bureau Van Dijk’s Zephyr M&As database and Danish register data. Additionally, I explore the heterogeneous effect of different types of M&As across employee groups. I find that M&As generally increase the probability of employee turnover, particularly for employees with relatively low human capital. Nevertheless, the effect varies significantly for different types of M&A.","PeriodicalId":174886,"journal":{"name":"Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2903220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

With the worldwide growth of mergers and acquisitions (M&As), a number of studies in recent years have called their relative success into question. One reason for the poor performance of a number of deals may be negative employee reactions, such as employee turnover. Despite the widespread perception that M&As often lead to employee turnover, there is surprisingly weak empirical support provided in the literature. In particular, we know notably little regarding the characteristics of those who are departing. In this study, I address this gap by using a unique dataset resulting from the merger of Bureau Van Dijk’s Zephyr M&As database and Danish register data. Additionally, I explore the heterogeneous effect of different types of M&As across employee groups. I find that M&As generally increase the probability of employee turnover, particularly for employees with relatively low human capital. Nevertheless, the effect varies significantly for different types of M&A.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并购与员工流失:谁要离开?
随着全球并购的增长,近年来的一些研究对并购的相对成功提出了质疑。许多交易表现不佳的一个原因可能是员工的负面反应,比如员工离职。尽管人们普遍认为并购经常导致员工离职,但文献中提供的实证支持却令人惊讶地薄弱。特别是,我们对那些即将离开的人的特征所知甚少。在本研究中,我通过使用由Bureau Van Dijk的Zephyr并购数据库和丹麦注册数据合并而成的独特数据集来解决这一差距。此外,我还探讨了不同类型的并购在员工群体中的异质效应。我发现,并购通常会增加员工离职的可能性,尤其是对于人力资本相对较低的员工。然而,对于不同类型的并购,其效果存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Number Two Executives: Bottom-up Monitoring Organization Budgetary Control System Changes in Persistence of Performance Over Time The Resource-Based Paradox of Impact-Oriented Strategies: A Study in the Context of Microcredit A Comprehensive Analysis of Top Indian Cosmetic Company : LAKME
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1